However, in view of the observations of the Commission and the representatives on this matter, this Court considers that the State must take the necessary measures to ensure that the persons it has appointed to implement the measures, as well as the members of the working group, take concrete steps to implement the measures as regards, inter alia, the issuing of the remainder of the safe conducts and the scheduling of meetings with the participation of the beneficiaries or their representatives. In addition, the Court takes note of the commitment expressed by the representatives to facilitate compliance with these measures. Based on the foregoing, the Court reiterates the provisions of considering paragraph 20 of the Order of December 1, 2011, and considers it essential that, in its next report, the State indicate the steps it has taken, and also that it continue to implement the necessary and sufficient measures: (a) to continue the periodic meetings of the working group composed of State officials, with the participation of the beneficiaries and/or their representatives to collaborate on the implementation of the measures ordered by the Court, and (b) to submit a report with the timetable of the next meetings. B) Regarding the situation of Solain Pie or Solain Pierre or Solange Pierre 22. In its report of February 1, 2012, the State requested that the provisional measures in favor of Solain Pierre be lifted, because she had died in December 2012. 23. In this regard, in their briefs of December 20, 2011, and February 1, 2012, based on the decease of Solain Pierre on December 4, 2011, the representatives asked the Court to lift the measures in her favor. On February 17, 2012, the Commission also referred to the death of Ms. Pierre. Considerations of the Court 24. Since Solange Pierre is now deceased the provisional measures in her favor are rescinded. C) Regarding the situation of the children of Solain Pie or Solain Pierre or Solange Pierre 25. In its report of February 1, 2012, the State requested that the measures in favor of the children of Solange Pierre be lifted, because, with their mother’s death, the reasons for the provisional measures granted in their favor had ceased to exist. 26. In their observations of December 20, 2011, and February 1 and 10, 2012, the representatives indicated that Solange Pierre’s children are in a situation of extreme gravity and urgency with respect to their life and personal integrity, because they continue to be subjected to harassment and criticism due to their work. In this regard, the representatives indicated that her daughter Manuela began to work in the legal department of the Dominican-Haitian Women’s Movement (MUDHA), and to have greater public exposure in representation of the organization, and that her son Carlos has worked for several months in this organization’s transportation department. They added that Solange Pierre’s children had informed them that, in the last two weeks, they had been subjected to various acts of intimidation, such as the fact that, on several occasions, they have observed a car with tinted windows drive slowly by their home, turn round and then drive rapidly away. Consequently, and given the close ties between the surname Pierre and the activities of MUDHA, the representatives requested that the provisional measures be maintained in favor of Solain Pierre’s children, and that the working group be ordered to meet with the representatives to agree on and implement the necessary measures to protect their life and personal integrity. 6