CEJIL

- Libreria
- Registrarse

Anterior 62 / 67 Próximo

Vista normal

Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary So ordered, Elizabeth Odio Benito President Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary 62

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

● ● ●

Uwazi es desarrollado por
CEJIL
Libreria
Acceder

Información
14relaciones

Consejos de búsqueda

Buscar texto

Type something in the search box to get some results.

Tabla de Contenidos

I INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE AND PURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE4
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT5
III JURISDICTION8
IV PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS8
A. Exception regarding the alleged failure to comply with the exhaustion of domestic remedies and request for review of legality8
A.1. Arguments of the State and observations of the Commission and the representatives8
A.2. Considerations of the Court10
B. Exception on the alleged lack of jurisdiction of the Court to act as fourth instance12
B.1. Arguments of the State and observations of the Commission and the representatives12
B.2. Considerations of the Court13
C. Exception regarding the alleged improper inclusion of Article 26 of the Convention in the case of Walter Antonio Valenzuela Cerna, Jean Aubert Díaz Alvarado and Marta Silvana Rodríguez Ricse13
C.1 Arguments of the State and observations of the Commission and the representatives13
C.2 Considerations of the Court14
V PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS14
A. Factual Framework14
A.1 On the alleged improper inclusion in the pleadings and motions brief of allegations regarding the alleged impact on rights not included in the Admissibility Report No. 19/15, regarding Walter Antonio Valenzuela Cerna, Jean Aubert Díaz Alvarado and Marta Silvana Rodríguez Ricse14
A.2. On the alleged improper inclusion of facts and allegations proposed by the representatives of Walter Antonio Valenzuela Cerna15
A.3. On the two preliminary observations presented by the State16
VI EVIDENCE16
A. Admissibility of documental evidence16
B. Admissibility of the alleged victims’ statements, testimonial and expert evidence19
VII FACTS19
A. Relevant regulatory framework regarding the evaluation and ratification procedure of judges and prosecutors by the CNM19
B. On the process of evaluation and ratification of the alleged victims23
B.1 Regarding Jorge Luis Cuya Lavy23
B.2 Regarding Walter Antonio Valenzuela Cerna24
B.3 Regarding Jean Aubert Díaz Alvarado25
B.4. Regarding Marta Silvana Rodríguez Ricse26
VIII MERITS27
VIII-1 RIGHTS TO JUDICIAL GUARANTEES, RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND POLITICAL RIGHTS, IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATIONS TO RESPECT AND GUARANTEE RIGHTS and DUTY TO ADOPT DOMESTIC LAW PROVISIONS OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION 10428
A. Arguments of the Commission and the parties28
A.1. Right to judicial guarantees, judicial independence, right to expect duly substantiated decisions and the principle of legality28
A.2. Regarding the right to know in advance and in detail the accusation made and to have adequate time and means to prepare a defense30
A.3. Political Rights31
B. Considerations of the Court32
B.1. The specific guarantees to safeguard the judicial independence of judges and their applicability to prosecutors due to the nature of the duties they undertake32
B.2. Duty to substantiate decisions35
B.3. Regarding the right to know in advance and in detail the accusation made and to have adequate time and means to prepare a defense39
B.4. Political rights40
C. Conclusion41
VIII-2 RIGHT TO JUDICIAL PROTECTION, IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATIONS TO RESPECT AND GUARANTEE RIGHTS and THE DUTY TO ADOPT DOMESTIC LAW PROVISIONS OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION42
A. Arguments of the Commission and the parties42
B. Considerations of the Court43
C. Conclusion46
IX REPARATIONS46
A. Injured party47
B. Measures of restitution, satisfaction and guarantees of non-repetition47
B.1 Measures of restitution47
B.2 Measures of satisfaction49
C. Non-repetition measures49
D. Additional Measures51
E. Compensation52
E.1 Pecuniary Damage 18052
E.2 Non-pecuniary damage55
F. Costs and expenses56
G. Victims’ Legal Assistance Fund58
H. Method of complying with the payments ordered59
X OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS59
CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE VIO GROSSI63
CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE SIERRA PORTO65

Cuya Lavy y otros. Sentencia de 28 de septiembre de 2021

Sentencia de la Corte IDH

Preview

Tipo

Costas
Excepciones Preliminares
Fondo
Reparaciones

Fecha: 28 sept 2021

Mecanismo

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Número: C 438

País

Perú

Firmantes

Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot
Eduardo Vio Grossi
Elizabeth Odio Benito
Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Leoncio Patricio Pazmiño Freire
Ricardo C. Pérez Manrique

Votos separados

Eduardo Vio Grossi
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

Documentos primarios

Cuya Lavy y otros. Sentencia de 28 de septiembre de 2021.pdf
Spanish
ML TdC
Descargar Ver
Cuya Lavy y otros. Judgment. September 28, 2021.pdf
English
Descargar Ver

Archivos de soporte

Cuya Lavy y otros. Sentencia de 28 de septiembre de 2021.docx493.53 kB

Sin referencias

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

No existe etiqueta1
- Causa1
Documentos de la CorteIDH5
- Resolución de Presidencia de la CorteIDH1
- Audiencia2
- Sentencia de la Corte IDH1
- Resolución de la Corte IDH1
Mecanismo1
- Organismo1
País1
- País1
Firmante Voto separado1
- Juez/a y/o Comisionado/a1
Firmantes3
- Juez/a y/o Comisionado/a3
Votos separados2
- Voto Separado2

Crear Referencia

Seleccionar tipo de relación

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Consejos de búsqueda

Notificaciones

Estás al día

La actividad nueva se mostrará aquí.