communication was stamped by the Peruvian General Directorate of Immigration and Naturalization.122 According to the State, on crossing the border, the Pacheco Tineo family was handed over to the Peruvian immigration authorities and not to the Peruvian police. 123 Nevertheless, the presumed victims allege that, when they reached the border between Bolivia and Peru, they were shut up in a room, their belongings were taken, and they did not receive any food, following which, when crossing the border, they were handed over to the Peruvian police, accused of being terrorists, and it was indicated that subversive materials had been found on them. 104. In this regard, a report on “police record of the citizens Romualdo [sic] Juan Pacheco Osco and Fredesvinda Tineo Godos,” issued on August 3, 2012, by the Director General of the INTERPOL National Central Office (NCO) of the Bolivian Police, and forwarded by the State with its answering brief, indicates the following: [On April 8, 1997,] “message Ref. 824 was received from our counterpart INTERPOL NCO-Lima/Peru, in reply to our message Ref. 481-La Paz dated 03/04/1997 concerning the request for background information for processing the place of residence of the [said] citizens,” indicating that an arrest warrant exists for them at the request of the Special Correctional Court of Lima File 296-93 dated 04/12/1996, for the crime of terrorism. [On March 20, 2001,]124 the following fax was received at […] 7.28 p.m. that information had been received that the couple PACHECO OSCO RUMUALDO JUAN and TINEO GODOS FREDESVINDA, of Peruvian nationality, had been detained bearing false documents, both of whom, in 1966 [sic]125 had been granted political asylum in Bolivia and who subsequently renounced this benefit in order to travel to Chile; it had been planned to deport them to Chile, but learning that the Peruvian citizens were required by the Peruvian Police for the crime of terrorism, the pertinent coordination was carried out with the Police Attaché of the Peruvian Embassy to proceed to hand them over at the Desaguadero border …. Responding to the note of March 23, 2001, of the INTERPOL NCO with regard to the message sent by its counterpart in Lima Peru, the following information is provided: on February 24, 2001, the Bolivian Immigration Service deported PACHECHO OSCO RUMUALDO JUAN and TINEO GODOS FREDESVINDA, because they had entered the country illegally via Kasani, on the Bolivia-Peru border, bearing passports without the exit stamp from Peru or the entry stamp into Bolivia, and ignoring whether these passports were authentic or false, the Police Attaché of the Peruvian Embassy in Bolivia was informed of the matter.” [In the] Weekly Report of February 19 to March 4, 2001, sent with Note UPACOlvi/Cite No. 0023/2001 dated March 6, 2001, from Lieutenant Osear Muüoz Colodro, Commander of UPACOM, to Osear A. Jordán Bacigalupo, Director of the National Immigration Service, information was provided that on 24/02/2001 at 6.30 a.m., second Sergeants Gualberto Fernández Trujillo and Martin Limachi Kantuta, members of the “UPACOM,” together with Oscar Jordán Bacigalupo (National Director of SENAMIG), Juan Carlos Molina (Chief Adviser to SENAMIG) and Lizardo Ortega (Inspector), proceeded to detain two foreign citizens of Peruvian nationality; they detained Rumaldo Pacheco and Fredesvinda Tineo, accompanied by their three underage children on a street of La Paz. They were taken in a vehicle with the license plate 1034-GIL, driven by Félix Ulo. According to the evidence, the purpose of the detention and deportation was “to hand them over to the National Police of Peru (PNP), returning at 1.30 p.m., without any incidents.”126 105. On February 25, 2001, one day after the deportation of the family, the Chilean Consulate General in La Paz sent a “confidential official message” to its Consular General Directorate in Santiago, with “urgent” priority, in which it advised: 1. Regarding the case of the Peruvian refugee Romualdo (sic) Pacheco and family, we would like to advise the following: 122 Cf. Communication of the Head of Immigration of Desaguadero–Bolivia to the Head of Immigration of Desaguadero–Peru, stamped February 24, 2001 (evidence file, folio 70) 123 Confirmed by the Report of Juan Carlos Molina sent to Rodolfo Téllez Flores, Director of Legal Affairs of the National Immigration Service, dated March 23, 2004 (evidence file, folio 38). 124 There could be a clerical error in the document, because it could be February 20, although this is unclear. 125 According to the facts, this would be in 1996. 126 Cf. Report of second Sergeant Rafael Tarquí Condori, investigator assigned to the case, in answer to Note PROGE-DSPDRLE-DGPDHMA No. 006/2012 (evidence file, folios 1099 to 1101). 35