77 indigenous organizations and those who offer services regarding violence, municipal authorities, and government employees of the judicial branch so as to, inter alia, “sensitize [them] in regards to the attention of women and their development in conditions that promote equal protection and freedom from violence.” 238. In this regard, the State provided definite information regarding programs and actions developed on this subject, and the existence and validity were not objected to by the Commission, and to which the Commission also did not raise information regarding their possible problems. As such, the Court states that the duty to provide motive and establish the claims for reparations and costs is not satisfied with generic requests where there is no attached evidence or argumentation (supra paras. 232 and 238). The abovementioned prevents the Court from addressing the requested measures. viii) Protocol for the diligent investigation of acts of violence 239. The Commission requested the Court to order the State to design protocols to facilitate and promote the effective, standardized, and transparent investigation of acts of physical, sexual, and psychological violence, which should include a description of the complex nature of the evidence, and details of the minimum evidence that must be collected in order to provide adequate probative grounds, according to the provisions of the Istanbul Protocol. 240. The State reported on the adoption of distinct protocols related with the investigation of the violence against women in the state of Guerrero such as the protocols of care to women in situations of violence and of the investigation of crimes of homicide with a focus on feminicides. Moreover, it reported on the publication of two manuals entitled, “Detection Networks, Support and Reference of Cases of Violence Against Indigenous Women of Guerrero,” and “Reference Models of Cases of Gender Violence for the state of Guerrero,” as well as other instruments related to the investigation and attention to violence against women, among others, the “Integrated Model for the Prevention and Attention of Family and Sexual violence,” model used by health units, and the Program of “Medical Attention to Raped Persons.” Likewise, the State provided information on the process of fitting the Istanbul Protocol to the national context through elaboration and application of the Special Medical/Psychological Report for Cases of Possible Torture and/or Mistreatment, issued by the Office of the Attorney General of the Republic, as well as by publication of institutional guidelines for the application of this Report to be followed by the agents of the Office of the Public Prosecutor of the Federation, and the forensic experts and/or criminal pathologists of the Office of the Attorney General of the Republic. Furthermore, it advised that 29 federative entities had received training on this report and three federative entities were in the process of training the attorney general’s offices on the implementation of the Istanbul Protocol. Lastly, the State provided information on the elaboration of Mexican Official Norm NOM-046-SSA2-2005 on domestic and sexual violence and violence against women, which contains criteria to prevent and deal with this. This norm establishes various obligations for personal health, among others, to inform the Public Prosecutor’s Office to carry out the corresponding investigations, and it was created pursuant to a friendly settlement with the Inter-American Commission. 241. The Court takes note of the information provided by the State concerning the existence of the mentioned instruments, and the training activities that the federative entities have been holding. However, the State did not attach the document on the “national contextualization” of the Istanbul Protocol or on its application in the state of Guerrero. Furthermore, the Court positively notes the existence of Mexican Official Norm NOM-046-SSA2-2005, which contains criteria for preventing and dealing with sexual abuse and violence against women, as well as detection and investigation standards for health personnel. Nevertheless, the Court notes that despite that in its introduction it states that “with the ellaboration of this Mexican Official Norm [the State] complies with the commitments acquired in the international forum,” and despite that the Norm is the