recorded in a video made by the State. The following were the main activities: (a) on Monday, August 17, the delegation visited Paramaribo, where meetings were held with different authorities and delegations, including the recently appointed Minister for Foreign Affairs, and the representative of the National Assembly. In addition, meetings were held with the participation, among others, of representatives of the Kaliña and Lokono peoples, the Maroon communities, the Commission, and the State; (b) on Tuesday, August 18, a meeting was held with the representatives of Christiaankondre and Langamankondre and a brief visit was made to these villages where their opinions were heard, following which the delegation was welcomed by the members of these communities, and (c) on Wednesday, August 19, a visit was made to the Galibi Nature Reserve; a meeting was held in Erowarte with representatives of six of the indigenous communities, namely: Erowarte, Tapuku, Pierrekondre, Marijkedorp (or Wan Shi Sha), Alfonsdorp and Bigiston, during which their opinions were heard. In addition, the delegation drove through these indigenous villages, with the exception of Alfonsdorp and Bigiston and, lastly, a visit was made to the Maroon village of Moengotapu, to the Wane Kreek Nature Reserve, and to the area of the mining concession. 15. Observations on the visit and reception of videos. On September 8, 2015, the Court received the observations on the visit of the Commission and of the representatives. On the same date, the Court received the videos of the on-site procedure sent by the State and contained on six DVDs in the edited and the unedited versions. In its communication, the State requested additional time to send its observations on the visit, and the Court agreed to this. These observations and some annexes were received on September 17 and 18, 2015, respectively. 16. Helpful evidence requested following the visit. During the on-site procedure, the Court’s delegation gave the State a list of helpful evidence. In addition, on August 25, 2015, the Secretariat sent a letter reiterating and specifying this evidence to both the State and the representatives.14 In this regard, on September 8, 2015, the Court received the annexes with helpful evidence sent by the representatives.15 On September 17, 18, 22, 29 and 30, 2015, the 14 Letter of the Secretariat of the Inter-American Court of August 25, 2015 (merits file, folio 923). This letter requested the following as helpful evidence: (a) from the State, a list of the Maroon communities with the number of their inhabitants, in the territories claimed in this case; a list of the participants in the meeting held on September 27, 2013, during which three commissions were formed; lists of the participants in the meetings that took place on January 31 and February 28, 2003, with the Ministers of Regional Development and of Natural Resources, and copies of freehold land titles, and leasehold titles and long-term leases granted to both indigenous and non-indigenous persons in Tuinstad Albina; (b) from the representatives, information concerning the ancestral ties between the Barbakoea and Koriabo culture and that of the Kaliña and Lokono peoples; a recent map of the territory claimed in this case; a list of communities whose land is not being claimed, and the judgment of May 1998, in the case of Celientje Martina JoeroejaKoewie and Others v. Suriname, as well as the judgment of May 1998 in the case of Tjang A. Sjin v. Zaalman and Others, and (c) from both parties, updated information concerning events following the submission of the draft bill on traditional authorities; the record of the constitution of the Galibi Nature Reserve Dialogue Commission, and information regarding activities that are underway; a communication of August 26, 1978, signed by Jr. F. C. Bubberman, Head of the State Forest Management Service, and A. C. Cirino, Chair of KANO; a list of participants in the 1986 meeting in Wan Shi Sha concerning the establishment of the Wane Kreek Nature Reserve, and documentation indicating when the mining operations in the Wane Kreek Nature Reserve began and ended. 15 Letter of the Secretariat of the Inter-American Court of September 11, 2015 (merits file, folio 978). The representatives sent 10 annexes, which contained the following: (a) an educational project to raise awareness of land rights under Suriname law and international law, entitled “Wi Gon Na Wi”; (b) maps of the Maroon territories and other occupied indigenous areas; (c) Gazon Matodja’s correspondence with regard to a dialogue process concerning land rights; (d) a judicial decision on a complaint filed by indigenous residents of Pierrekondre against the State of Suriname and Suriname Stone & Industries N.V; (e) receipts arising from representation expenses, and (f) a statement by the Ajintoena family in which they state that they live peacefully in the territories of the Lokono People and are on good terms with the traditional indigenous authorities (evidence file, folios 2867 to 2920). With regard to the documentation they were asked to provide, the representatives did not send the following because they did not have the information: (a) the list of participants in the 1986 meeting in Wan Shi Sha concerning the establishment of the Wane Kreek Nature 9