representatives considered that this information puts the “Radilla family” at risk, since the State of Guerrero “is extremely violent and unsafe and the Radilla family is not exempt from that grave situation.” For this reason, they requested that the Court urge the State to “abstain from issuing public reports on the process of compliance with the Judgment as regards the payment of the financial compensation and [,] in particular [,] the amounts and payment dates.” On the other hand, the representatives petitioned the Court to “[,] request [that] the Mexican State reconsider the possibility of recognizing and extending the financial compensation to all of Mr. Radilla Pacheco’s heirs in the adoption of the reparation measures, as the Court indicated in its Judgment in this case.” C. Observations of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights 11. The Commission noted that significant progress has been made and that the controversy regarding the mode of compliance with the compensation payments ordered in the Judgment had been settled. The Commission also acknowledged “the fluid dialogue which, according to the latest reports, has evidently taken place between the judicial authority in charge of authorizing the payments, and the Ministry of the Interior,” and that according to said information, most of the indemnities can now be paid. Nevertheless, it noted that “the judge who would need to authorize this last compensation payment in favor of Rosendo Radilla, had asked for additional information.” Furthermore, it endorsed the request made by the State, and reiterated by the representatives, that the Court issue a ruling on this point so that the payment of the compensation can be made effective. D. Considerations of the Court 12. In order for the Court to properly assess the degree of compliance with the instant reparation measure, it is necessary to recall that the Judgment ordered, on the one hand, the payment of certain amounts for the pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages suffered by Mr. Rosendo Radilla Pacheco. Pursuant to paragraph 387 of the Judgment, said amounts were to be distributed, in equal parts, among his heirs. On the other hand, the Court also ordered the payment of certain amounts for the non-pecuniary damage suffered by Tita, Andrea and Rosendo Radilla Martínez, which, according to paragraph 386 of the Judgment, were to be paid directly to these persons. Likewise, paragraph 388 of the Judgment indicates that in the event that the beneficiaries, namely, Tita, Andrea and Rosendo Radilla Martínez, should die before delivery of the corresponding compensations, these shall be delivered directly to their successors, in accordance with the applicable domestic legislation. Finally, the Court also ordered an amount for costs and expenses to be paid to Mrs. Tita Radilla Martínez who, in turn, was required to pass this on to the relevant organizations, pursuant to paragraphs 385 and 386 of the Judgment. 13. In the instant Order it is evident that several assumptions have arisen, regarding compliance with this measure of reparation, which should be addressed separately. In the first place, the Court recalls that in the Order of May 19, 2011 in this case it was decided that, given that the State had indicated that it was able to make the payments corresponding to Tita and Rosendo Radilla Martínez, and given that these persons did not wish to receive those payments, the Court considered that the requirements set out in 5