b) Publish in the official gazette and in another national newspaper the section entitled “Proven Facts” and the operative paragraphs of the Judgment (first operative paragraph, subparagraph (c), of the Judgment of March 3, 2005); and c) Pay the amounts established in paragraphs 92, 94, 95, 98, 99, 100, 101, 120, and 121 of the Judgment for non-pecuniary and pecuniary damage to Martha Flores Gutiérrez, José Carlos Huilca Flores, Indira Isabel Huilca Flores, Flor de María Huilca Gutiérrez, Katiuska Tatiana Huilca Gutiérrez, Pedro Humberto Huilca Gutiérrez and Julio César Escobar Flores (first operative paragraph, subparagraphs (h), (i) and (j), of the Judgment of March 3, 2005). 2. That it will keep open the proceeding for monitoring compliance with regard to the aspects pending fulfillment, namely the obligations to: a) Investigate effectively the facts of the instant case in order to identify, prosecute and punish the perpetrators and masterminds of the extrajudicial execution of Pedro Huilca Tecse (first operative paragraph, subparagraph (a), of the Judgment of March 3, 2005); b) Establish a course or subject on human rights and labor law, called the “Cátedra Pedro Huilca” (first operative paragraph, subparagraph (d), of the Judgment of March 3, 2005); c) Recall and praise the work of Pedro Huilca Tecse in favor of the trade union movement in Peru during the official celebrations of May 1 (Labor Day) (first operative paragraph, subparagraph (e), of the Judgment of March 3, 2005); d) Erect a bust in the memory of Pedro Huilca Tecse (first operative paragraph, subparagraph (f), of the Judgment of March 3, 2005); and e) Provide psychological care and treatment to the next of kin of Pedro Huilca Tecse (first operative paragraph, subparagraph (g), of the Judgment of March 3, 2005). 3. The Order of the Court of February 7, 2008, in which it declared: 1. That, as indicated in considering paragraphs 1 to 11 of [the] Order, the State had failed to comply with its obligation to inform this Court about the steps taken to comply with the measures ordered by the Court in the operative paragraphs of the Judgment on merits, reparations and costs delivered on March 3, 2005, and in the Order issued on September 22, 2006, in this case. 2. That it will keep the proceeding of monitoring compliance open with regard to the measures of reparation ordered by the Court in this case that remain pending. 4. The briefs of April 18, September 5 and October 1, 2008, April 17, 2009, January 15, June 15 and November 30, 2010, November 8, 2011, March 12, September 7 and 29, and November 12, 2012, and March 8, 2013, in which the State provided information on compliance with the Judgment (supra having seen paragraph 1). 5. The briefs of May 28 and November 3, 2008, February 25, July 21 and December 20, 2010, January 5, August 2 and December 7, 2012, and April 18, 2013, in which the representatives of the victims (hereinafter “the representatives”) presented their observations on the reports forwarded by the State (supra having seen paragraph 4). 6. The briefs of June 10, 2008, January 8, 2009, April 9 and September 24, 2010, March 19, 2012, and January 22 and May 3, 2013, in which the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Commission” or “the Commission”) presented its observations on the reports forwarded by the State (supra having seen paragraph 4). 2