444. The common interveners also indicated that the victims’ family members incurred expenses arising from the violations that affected the victims, particularly the expenses resulting from their visits to the victims while they were deprived of liberty. In this regard, the Court notes that it has no evidence to prove the exact amounts that the family members disbursed in this regard. However, the Court is able to determine, based on the statements made by the victims and their family members, that the latter incurred expenses when travelling to the prisons to visit the victims and to provide them with food and other necessary items.431 The Court also considers it reasonable to presume that, owing to the facts of this case and, fundamentally, owing to the deprivation of liberty, the family members had to incur different expenses. 445. Regarding the non-pecuniary damage, the Court has verified the psychological and moral impact on the eight victims of this case owing to the prosecution and sentencing for offenses of a terrorist nature and to having to serve a prison sentence and comply with ancillary penalties based on criminal judgments delivered in application of a law that was contrary to the Convention, in violation of guarantees of due process, the principle of equality and nondiscrimination, and the right to equal protection of the law. The Court has verified, by means of the statements of the victims and their family members and of the psychological appraisals prepared by Ms. Vargas Forman, the consequences for the victims of having been declared responsible as perpetrators of terrorist offenses in violation of the Convention on different aspects of their personal, community and family life,432 the effects of which continue even after having served – most of them – their prison sentences.433 At the personal level, the effects are related to personal changes, the suffering, and the consequences of the prosecution for terrorist offenses, as well as the time they remained in confinement. In addition, the arbitrary measures of pre-trial detention and the said criminal convictions had effects on the participation of the victims in their communities, especially in the case of Messrs. Norín Catrimán, Pichún Paillalao 431 Cf. Affidavits prepared on May 14, 2013, by presumed victims Juan Ciriaco Millacheo Licán and Juan Patricio Marileo Saravia, by witnesses Soledad Angélica Millacheo Licán and Juan Julio Millacheo Ñanco; on May 16, 2013, by witnesses Matías Ancalaf Prado, Karina del Carmen Prado Figueroa and Flora Collonao Millano; on May 17, 2013, by presumed victim José Benicio Huenchunao Mariñán, and on May 20, 2013, by witness Claudia Ximena Espinoza Gallardo (file of statements of presumed victims, witnesses and expert witnesses, folios 29, 31, 82, 83, 187, 188, 197, 231, 232, 238, 240, 255 and 260) and statement made por Víctor Manuel Ancalaf Llaupe before the Inter-American Court during the public hearing held on May 29 and 30, 2013. 432 Cf. Affidavits prepared on May 14, 2013, by presumed victims Juan Patricio Marileo Saravia and Juan Ciriaco Millacheo Licán, and by witnesses Soledad Angélica Millacheo Licán, Freddy Jonathan Marileo Marileo, Juan Julio Millacheo Ñanco and Gloria Isabel Millacheo Ñanco; on May 15, 2013, by expert witness Ruth Elizabeth Vargas Forman with regard to Víctor Manuel Ancalaf Llaupe and his family, in relation to Pascual Huentequeo Pichún Paillalao, Juan Ciriaco Millacheo Licán, Florencio Jaime Marileo Saravia, Juan Patricio Marileo Saravia and José Benicio Huenchunao Mariñán, in relation to Segundo Aniceto Norín Catrimán, and in relation to Patricia Roxana Troncoso Robles; on May 16, 2013, by witnesses Matías Ancalaf Prado, Karina del Carmen Prado Figueroa and Carlos Patricio Pichún Collonao, and on May 17, 2013, by presumed victim José Benicio Huenchunao Mariñán and by witness Mercedes Huenchunao Mariñán (file of statements of presumed victims, witnesses and expert witnesses, folios 96 to 33, 35, 84, 86, 99, 106 to 109, 192, 193, 197, 200, 205 to 210, 222, 233, 234, 256, 260, 267, 277, 416 to 424, 569 to 573, 589 to 592, 636 to 639, 657 and 658), and statements made by Víctor Manuel Ancalaf Llaupe, Florencio Jaime Marileo Saravia and Juan Pichún Collonao before the Inter-American Court during the public hearing held on May 29 and 30, 2013. 433 Cf. Affidavits prepared on May 14, 2013, by presumed victims Juan Patricio Marileo Saravia and Juan Ciriaco Millacheo Licán, by witnesses Soledad Angélica Millacheo Licán, Freddy Jonathan Marileo Marileo and Isabel Millacheo Ñanco; on May 15, 2013, by expert witness Ruth Elizabeth Vargas Forman in relation to Víctor Manuel Ancalaf Llaupe and family, in relation to Pascual Huantequeo Pichún Paillalao, Juan Ciriaco Millacheo Licán, Florencio Jaime Marileo Saravia, Juan Patricio Marileo Saravia and José Benicio Huenchunao, in relation to Segundo Aniceto Norín Catrimán, and in relation to Patricia Roxana Troncoso Robles; on May 16, 2013, by witnesses Matías Ancalaf Prado and Karina del Carmen Prado Figueroa; on May 17, 2013, by witness Mercedes Huenchunao Mariñán, and written statements prepared on May 27, 2013, by Segundo Ancieto Norín Catrimán and Patricia Roxana Troncoso Robles (file of statements of presumed victims, witnesses and expert witnesses, folios 33 to 35, 84, 96 to 99, 106 to 109, 192, 193, 199, 200, 233, 234, 267, 277, 416 to 424, 569 to 573, 589 to 592, 636 to 639, 657 and 658), and statements made by Víctor Manuel Ancalaf Llaupe, Florencio Jaime Marileo Saravia and Juan Pichún Collonao before the Inter-American Court during the public hearing held on May 29 and 30, 2013. 145