9 may be necessary to promptly and effectively comply with this reparation measure. Accordingly, the Court believes that paragraph six of the Judgment is pending compliance and requests the State to continue to report in detail, timely and completely on the progress made with the processing of the bills and the measures taken, or those that will be taken, so that they be adopted, as well as the effectiveness of the aforementioned legislative amendments for the compliance with this reparation measure. Chile also must disclose whether it has adopted any administrative action or otherwise aimed at fulfilling the guarantee of non-repetition. III. In relation to the obligation to reimburse the costs and expenses (operative paragraph seven and paragraph 164 of the Judgment) 23. The State reported that on May 30, 2007 it paid the amount awarded by the Court as costs and expenses, depositing said amount "in the Savings Account of the State Bank, whose holder is Ms. Elvira del Rosario Gómez Olivares." 24. The representative of the victim and his family did not make observations on any of the State reports. 25. The Committee noted "with satisfaction the fulfillment of what was ordered by the Court in operative paragraph seven of the [J]udgment." 26. The State reported that it had complied fully with this point in the report submitted on June 29, 2007, which was duly transmitted by the Court to the representative, who, despite repeated requests by the President of the Tribunal to submit observations on this report and other reports (supra Having Seen 4 and 10), did not make any observations. Taking into account the observations of the Commission, as well as the fact that more than three years have passed since the State reported that it had reimbursed all costs and expenses, without the representative submitting any comments or objections thereto, the Court concludes that Chile has complied with the provisions of operative paragraph seven of the Judgment within the one year timeframe set forth in the Judgment. IV. In relation to the obligation to publish the Judgment in the Official Gazette and another newspaper that is widely circulated nationally (operative paragraph eight and paragraph 162 of the Judgment) 27. In its first report, the State manifested that it made such publication "in the Official Gazette of Chile and in the La Nación newspaper on May 14 and 13, [2007] respectively," and provided copies of these publications. 28. The representative of the victim and his family did not make observations on any of the State reports. 29. The Committee noted "with satisfaction the fulfillment of what was ordered by the Court in operative paragraph eight of the [J]udgment." 30. In its first report on June 5, 2007, the State reported that it had complied fully with this point. Said report was duly transmitted by the Court to the representative, who, despite repeated requests by the President of the Tribunal to submit observations on this report and other reports (supra Having Seen 4 and 10), did not make any observations. Taking into account the proof of publication in the Official Gazette of Chile —and in a newspaper that is widely circulated nationally— provided by the State, the Commission's observations, as well as the fact that more than three years have passed since the State reported the execution of said publications without the representative making any comments or objections thereto, the Court