“implemented transitory article 55 of the Constitution, which granted the Black communities that were occupying wastelands in the rural areas on the banks of the rivers of the Pacific watershed, as well as in other areas of the country with similar conditions, the right to collective ownership of these lands,” among other matters. 31. In addition, the State referred to the decisions handed down by the Constitutional Court of Colombia from which are derived, on the one hand, the implementation of the special measures of protection in favor of the members of the communities of Jiguamiandó and Curvaradó, among other communities and, on the other hand, the supervision of implementation. These decisions are: (1) Judgment T-025 of 2004, by which the Constitutional Court declared the “existence of a state of unconstitutionality in relation to the situation of the internally displaced population”; (2) Decision 005 of 2009 relating to the “protection of the fundamental rights of the Afro-descendant population, victim of forced displacement”; (3) the Decision of May 18, 2010, adopting “preventive measures of immediate protection to safeguard the fundamental rights of the Afro-Colombian communities of Curvaradó and Jiguamiandó”; (4) Decision 384 of 2010 concerning “compliance with the Decision of May 18, 2010”; (5) Decision 045/12 of March 7, 2012, regarding different requests made by the Ministry of the Interior in relation to orders arising from the previous decisions, and (6) Decision 112 of May 18, 2012, by which the Constitutional Court evaluated the implementation of the “Urgent Provisional Plan for the Prevention of Displacement, and Individual and Collective Protection in the Curvaradó and Jiguamiandó [sic] River Basins,” among other matters, in compliance with the orders issued in the said Decision 045/12. In its brief of February 5, 2013 (supra having seen paragraph 4), the State referred to Decision 299 of December 18, 2012, forwarded to the Court by the Inter-American Commission (supra having seen paragraph 6), concerning, among other matters, the “evaluation of the orders given in the decisions of May 18, 2010, and A045 and 112 of 2012.” The Court will refer below to these decision (infra considering paragraphs 49 to 56). In this regard, Colombian also indicated that, in these matters, the Government periodically submits monitoring and compliance reports to the Constitutional Court on “the actions taken and mechanisms created to comply with each decision, indicating the entities involved and the respective status of compliance […].” 32. Lastly, the State indicated that, even if the present provisional measures are annulled, based on the provisions of Article 1(1) of the American Convention, as well as on the obligations imposed by domestic laws and the Constitutional Court, it will continue responding to the needs for protection of the members of the communities of the Jiguamiandó and of the Curvaradó. E.1.2. Government authorities or entities responsible for the protection of the beneficiaries of the provisional measures and of other inhabitants of the communities of the Jiguamiandó and of the Curvaradó, and their respective competences in this regard 33. The State mentioned different government entities assigned to the implementation and supervision of the measures of protection ordered in Colombia, as well as the provisional measures ordered by this Court: 1) Ministry of the Interior: “all the institutional procedures to coordinate the actions aimed at the protection of the human rights of the members of the communities of the Jiguamiandó and Curvaradó” are implemented through the Human Rights Directorate and the Directorate for the Affairs of the Black, Afro-Colombian, Raizal, and Palenquero Communities. In addition, the National Protection Unit has assumed the safeguard of the beneficiaries of these provisional measures. This Unit is the Technical Secretariat of the 13