information regarding the fact that the sketch was written pursuant to the Judgment delivered by the Court in this case. 43. The representatives indicated biographical sketch is in progress.” that “compliance with the publication of the 44. The Commission indicated that “the implementation of this form of reparation is still in progress and that agreements […] have been reached in order to implement it. 45. The Court values the actions taken by the State to comply with the publication of the biographical sketch that is the object of this reparation measure. Based on the information provided by the State, the Tribunal awaits information on the publication of the work. I. Obligation to provide psychological and/or psychiatric assistance through specialized public health institutions to the victims that request it (Operative Paragraph 16 of the Judgment) 46. The State reported that the representatives rejected the Public Security Secretariat’s offer of “psychological assistance, through the Comprehensive System of Assistance for Victims (SIAV, in Spanish), for all of Mr. Rosendo Radilla's next of kin, regardless of whether they had been designated as beneficiaries by the Court […] in its [J]udgment.” Therefore, “the Ministry of the Interior informed the victims and their representatives that it is negotiating so that the psychological assistance be provided through the National Human Rights Commission, and the psychiatric assistance, if required, through a public health institution in the state of Guerrero.” 47. The representatives stated that the State continues to “negotiate with the National Human Rights Commission concerning the psychological assistance, and it is unkow[n] which health institution of the state of Guerrero will provide the psychiatric assistance.” 48. The Commission indicated that it “considere[d] the fact that the parties have reached agreements on implementation of this reparation measure to be positive”; therefore, it requested that the Court require the State to submit “updated information on the measures carried out to comply with this order of the [J]udgment.” 49. The Court values the State's offer to provide psychological and/or psychiatric assistance not only to the victims declared in the Judgment, but also to other relatives of Mr. Rosendo Radilla Pacheco. However, it notes that, to date, the State has not provided psychological and/or psychiatric care for the victims in this case, as ordered in the Judgment, because it has not yet been determined which public institutions will be charged with that task. Therefore, the Court finds that the State must continue with appropriate steps so that the victims begin to receive the required attention as soon as possible. J) Obligation to pay the compensation awarded as pecuniary and nonpecuniary damages and costs and expenses (Operative Paragraph 17 of the Judgment) 50. The State reported that it had “made the necessary resources available in order to pay [the compensations] as indicated in the [J]udgment.” However, “the corresponding amounts have not been paid […] due to circumstances beyond the control of the State.” It indicated that it has proposed to the representatives diverse procedures for payment, such 15