108 By four votes in favor and two against, that: 6. The State violated, to the detriment of the forcibly disappeared victims and their next of kin, the rights to judicial guarantees and judicial protection recognized in Articles 8(1) and 25(1) of the American Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, as well as in relation to Articles 1, 6 and 8 of the Inter-American Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture, and Article I(b) of the Inter-American Convention on Forced Disappearance of Persons, from March 15, 2002, the date of its entry into force in Peru. In addition, Peru violated the right to know the truth of the relatives of the disappeared victims. All this, pursuant to paragraphs 215 to 229 and 237 to 270 of this judgment. Likewise, the State violated Article 7(6) of the American Convention, to the detriment of Elihoref Huamaní Vergara and his next of kin, pursuant to paragraphs 230 to 236 of this judgment. Dissenting, Judges Pérez Pérez and Vio Grossi. By five votes in favor and one against, that: 7. The State violated the right to personal integrity established in Article 5(1) of the American Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of Zósimo Hilario Quispe, Marcelo Hilario Quispe, Gregorio Hilario Quispe, Zenón Cirilo Osnayo Tunque, Víctor Carhuapoma de la Cruz, Abilio Hilario Quispe, Marcelina Guillen Riveros, Marino Huamaní Vergara, Ana de la Cruz Carhuapoma, Viviano Hilario Mancha, Dolores Morán Paucar, Justiniano Guillén Ccanto, Victoria Riveros Valencia and Alejandro Huamaní Robles. All of the above pursuant to paragraphs 274 to 281 of this judgment. Dissenting, Judge Vio Grossi. By five votes in favor and one against, that: 8. The Court does not have sufficient evidence to establish the alleged violation of Articles 11 and 17 of the American Convention, pursuant to paragraph 193 of this judgment. Dissenting, Judge Vio Grossi. AND ESTABLISHES, By five votes in favor and one against, that: 9. This judgment constitutes per se a form of reparation. Dissenting, Judge Vio Grossi. By five votes in favor and one against, that: 10. The State shall carry out comprehensive, systematic and thorough investigations that are necessary to identify, determine, prosecute and, if appropriate, punish those responsible for the violations declared in this judgment, pursuant to paragraphs 289 to 290 herein. Dissenting, Judge Vio Grossi. By five votes in favor and one against, that: 11. The State shall initiate, in a systematic, rigorous and serious manner, and with adequate human and financial resources, the actions necessary for the exhumation and identification of the