E.1) Measure ordered by the Court 49. In the Judgment the Court found that “[t]he violations attributable to the State in the present case were perpetrated by police, and army personnel, as well as special security forces, in violation of imperative norms of International Law.” 55 It also found that “in order to adequately guarantee the right to life and integrity, the members of the security forces must receive adequate training.” Therefore, it decided in operative paragraph five and paragraphs 451, 452 and 460 of the Judgment that the State “must design and implement, within a reasonable period of time, human rights education programs, addressed to agents of the Peruvian police force, on the international standards regarding treatment of inmates.” E.2) Information and observations of the parties and the Inter-American Commission 50. The State made reference in its report of January 23, 2013 to the training of staff of the “National Penitentiary Institute (INPE for its acronym in Spanish), the governing body of the National Prison System.” In this regard it said it has “selected and trained” "new prison providers" by way of "three modules with courses for prison security specialists on matters relating to the orders of the Court, such as: [...] 1. Human Rights 2. Legal framework (laws), 3. Use of weapons, 4. Ethics 5. Leadership, 5. First Aid, and 7. Anger Management.” Also, in this report, it noted that the Office of Legal Counsel of the National Penitentiary Institute (INPE) reported on the 'Human Rights Manual on Prison Roles” which “was approved on July 18, 2008” and “makes the following points: the theoretical and normative framework of Human Rights in the National Penitentiary System [;] the inmate in the context of Human Rights[;] Prison staff in the context of Human Rights[;] Ethical conduct in the Prison System[;] Prison Security [and] Use of force in the Prison System.” With respect to the Ministry of the Interior, that document states that the National Human Rights Commission of said Ministry reported on Ministerial Resolution No. 1452-2006-IN of May 31, 2006, according to which “the Office of Police Education and Doctrine includes the subject of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law in its curriculum or study plan at the police education systems.” Moreover, it also indicated that the abovementioned subjects are mandatory and were taught to the staff of the National Intelligence Office and that the Division of General Staff of the Joint Command of the Armed Forces since 2003 “created the Center for International Humanitarian Law and Humans Rights within the Ministry of Defense.” Regarding education programs for police forces, the State referred to “the curriculum of the institutions of the educational system of the National Police,” among which it included that “[i]n the Institute of Graduate Police Studies [...] the course on Human Rights and the Environment was rendered”; that “[i]n the Police School three programs are carried out, [in which] [t]he “Workshop on Human Rights and Police Roles” was carried out with a total of 30 teaching hours,” “[t]he Human Rights and policing” seminar with “a total of 30 teaching hours” and “the Workshop on Human Rights and Ethical Conduct” with a total of 35 teaching hours.” It also said that “[i]n the Training and Police Specialization School [a]ll the courses approved in its Annual Plan make the subject of Human Rights a mandatory requirement” and that at the “Schools for PNP Officials” and “Technical Schools” the subject of Human Rights is rendered “within various academic semesters. It also said that “[t]he National Human Rights Commission of the Ministry of the Interior [...] has been developing since 2001, a training for police instructors in human rights within the police force with the collaboration of national and international human rights agencies.” It also indicated that it has signed a cooperation agreement with the International Red Cross, which helps them with the review of “the adaption of the institutional doctrine, regulations, manuals, directives, etc. with international standards on use of force and the protection and 55 Case of Miguel Castro Castro Prison. Merits, Reparations, and Costs, supra note 2, para. 451. 22