ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUGUST 22, 2013 CASE OF JUAN HUMBERTO SÁNCHEZ v. HONDURAS MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT HAVING SEEN: 1. The Judgment on preliminary objection, merits, reparations and costs (hereinafter “the Judgment”) delivered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court,” “the Court” or “this Court”) on June 7, 2003, in this case. 2. The orders on monitoring compliance with the Judgment issued by the Court on November 17, 2004, September 12, 2005, November 21, 2007, and February 20, 2012. In the last order, the Court decided that it would keep the procedure of monitoring compliance open with regard to the pending elements in this case: a) “Pay the compensation ordered for non-pecuniary damage in favor of Julio Sánchez” (subparagraph (h) of the ninth operative paragraph of the Judgment); b) “Continue investigating the facts of this case; identify the perpetrators and the masterminds as well as any eventual accessories after the facts, and impose the administrative and criminal penalties, as appropriate; that the next of kin of the victim must have full access and legal standing at all stages and in all instances of the said investigations, pursuant to domestic law and the provisions of the American Convention on Human Rights, and that the results of the investigation must be published” (tenth operative paragraph of the Judgment), y c) “Implement a system to register detainees that allows the legality of detentions to be monitored” (twelfth operative paragraph of the Judgment). 3. The reports on compliance with the Judgment presented by the State on May 22, 2012, and February 26, June 6 and 28, 2013, and their annexes. 4. The briefs of June 18, 2012, and April 1, June 5 and July 12, 2013, and their respective annex, in which the representatives of the victims (hereinafter “the representatives”) presented their observations on the State’s reports. 5. The briefs of July 2, 2012, and April 25 and July 26, 2013, in which the InterAmerican Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Commission”) submitted its observations on the State’s reports and on the information presented by the representatives. 6. The notes of the Secretariat of April 17, 2013, in which the President of the Court convened the parties and the Commission to a private hearing on monitoring compliance with the Judgment.