CEJIL

- Libreria
- Registrarse

Anterior 41 / 47 Próximo

Vista normal

So ordered, Diego García-Sayán President Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary 41

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

● ● ●

Uwazi es desarrollado por
CEJIL
Libreria
Acceder

Información
14relaciones

Consejos de búsqueda

Buscar texto

Type something in the search box to get some results.

Tabla de Contenidos

I INTRODUCTION TO THE CASE AND PURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE 4
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT5
III JURISDICTION6
IV EVIDENCE6
A)Documentary, testimonial and expert evidence 6
B) Admission of the evidence 7
V ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BY THE STTATE AND ENDORSEMENT OF THE FRIENDLY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 8
A. The friendly settlement agreement8
B. Considerations of the Court9
VI CONTEXT AND FACTS OF THE CASE 10
A. The prison system in Honduras 10
B. General conditions in the San Pedro Sula Prison 2
C. Specific conditions of cell No. 19 13
D. The fire in cell Nº 19 14
E. Causes of the fire 15
F. Situation of the victims’ next of kin 16
G. Judicial proceedings before the domestic courts 16
VII CONSIDERATIONS OF THE COURT REGARDING ARTICLES 4, 5, 7, 9, 8 AND 25, IN RELATION TO ARTICLES 1(1) AND 2 OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION 17
A. The rights violated 17
B. Obligation of prevention with regard to prison conditions 19
C. The next of kin of the deceased 22
VIII REPARATIONS (Application of Article 63(1) of the American Convention under the friendly settlement agreement) 23
A. Injured Party 24
B. Beneficiaries of the friendly settlement agreement 25
C. Measures of integral reparation: guarantees of non-repetition, rehabilitation and satisfaction 2
1. Guarantees of non-repetition 26
2. Rehabilitation 33
3. Satisfaction 2
4. Other measures requested 34
D. Obligation to investigate the facts that gave rise to the violations, and to identify, prosecute and, as appropriate, punish those responsible 35
E. Compensation and opportunities fund 36
1. Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage 36
F. Means of compliance with the payments ordered 37
IX OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 38
# SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE EDUARDO VIO GROSSI 42

Pacheco Teruel y otros. Sentencia de 27 de abril de 2012

Sentencia de la Corte IDH

Preview

Tipo

Costas
Fondo
Reparaciones

Fecha: 27 abr 2012

Mecanismo

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Número: C-241

País

Honduras

Firmantes

Alberto Pérez Pérez
Diego García-Sayán
Eduardo Vio Grossi
Leonardo A. Franco
Manuel E. Ventura Robles
Margarette May Macaulay
Rhadys Abreu Blondet

Votos separados

Eduardo Vio Grossi

Documentos primarios

Pacheco Teruel y otros. Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 27 de abril de 2012.pdf
Spanish
Descargar Ver
Pacheco Teruel et al. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of April 27, 2012.pdf
English
Descargar Ver

Archivos de soporte

Pacheco Teruel et al. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of April 27, 2012.doc357.89 kB

Pacheco Teruel y otros. Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 27 de abril de 2012.doc397.82 kB

Sin referencias

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

Firmantes6
- Juez/a y/o Comisionado/a6
País1
- País1
Mecanismo1
- Organismo1
Documentos de la CorteIDH4
- Resolución de la Corte IDH2
- Resolución de Presidencia de la CorteIDH1
- Audiencia1
No existe etiqueta1
- Causa1
Votos separados1
- Voto Separado1

Crear Referencia

Seleccionar tipo de relación

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Consejos de búsqueda

Notificaciones

Estás al día

La actividad nueva se mostrará aquí.