2 10. […] pay the amount established in paragraph 178 of the […] judgment to María Teresa De La Cruz Flores for costs and expenses, in the terms of this paragraph[;] […] 2. The Order of the Court Inter-American of November 23, 2007, regarding the Supervision of Compliance with the Judgment in the present case, in which it declared: 1. [t]hat, in accordance with that state in Considering clauses number eight, nine, and ten of the […] Order, the State has complied with its obligation to: a) pay the amounts specified in the Judgment as compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages and as reimbursement of costs and expenses to María Teresa De La Cruz Flores, Alcira Domitila Flores Rosas, widow of De La Cruz, Alcira Isabel De La Cruz Flores, Celso Fernando De La Cruz Flores, Jorge Alfonso De La Cruz Flores, Ana Teresa Blanco De La Cruz, and Danilo Alfredo Blanco De La Cruz, respectively (third, fourth, tenth, eleventh, and twelfth operative paragraphs of the Judgment of November 18, 2004); b) reinstate Mrs. De La Cruz Flores to the job that she was performing as a medical professional in public institutions at the time of her detention (sixth operative paragraph of the Judgment of November 18, 2004), and c) publish the section entitled “Proven Facts” as well as operative paragraphs one to three of the declaratory part of the Judgment in a newspaper of national circulation (ninth operative paragraph of the Judgment of November 18, 2004)[.] 2. [t]hat the Court will keep open the proceedings to monitor the compliance with the following obligations that remain unfulfilled, namely: a) to comply with the right to freedom from ex post facto laws and the requirements of due process in the new proceeding brought against Mrs. De La Cruz Flores (first operative paragraph of the Judgment of November 18, 2004); b) to provide medical and psychological care to the victim through the State’s health services, including the free supply of medication (fifth operative paragraph of the Judgment of November 18, 2004); c) to provide Mrs. De La Cruz Flores of a grant for training and professional development (seventh operative paragraph of the Judgment of November 18, 2004); d) to re-enter Mrs. De La Cruz Flores in the respective retirement registry (eighth operative paragraph of the Judgment of November 18, 2004); e) to publish the section entitled “Proven Facts” as well as operative paragraphs 1 to 3 of the declaratory part of the Judgment in the Official Newspaper (ninth operative paragraph of the Judgment of November 18, 2004). […] 3. The communications of December 19, 2007; April 15 and 18, and August 25, 2008; December 15 and 18, 2009; and January 22, February 19, and March 5, 2010; through which the State of Peru, (hereinafter “the State” or “Peru”) referred to the compliance with the Judgment. 4. The briefs of December 13 and 17, 2007; April 9, June 3, and October 17 and 27, 2008; April 8 and 14, June 23, July 16, and December 26, 2009; and February 14 and 15, and May 13, 2010; in which the representative of the victim (hereinafter “the representative”) presented its observations regarding the state of compliance with the Judgment. 5. The communications of June 5, 2008, December 9 and 17, 2009, and March 19, 2010, through which the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Commission” or “the Inter-American Commission”) presented its observations regarding the state of compliance with the Judgment.