Murillo” and it referred to the actions adopted within the framework of the Departamental Return Meeting [Mesa Departamental de Retorno] in favor of the Kankuamo people who returned to said municipalities. Moreover, the State emphasized certain actions taken to comply with the Protection Judgment 2595 [Sentencia de Tutela N° 2597] of November 2, 2005, issued by the Superior Council of the Judicature in favor of 17 families of the Kankuamo Indigenous Community, who, up to date, are in a situation of forced displacement in the city of Bogota". In addition, it mentioned that by reason of the orders issued by the Constitutional Court, especially “the judgment T-025 of 2004 and Court Order 004 of 2009[,], it was requested to some entities of the National Government [,] among other things, the design of a Program to ensure the rights of the indigenous peoples who are affected by the displacement”. By reason of “the order issued by the Constitutional Court, there is a specific space, like the “Meeting for Dialogue and Consensus”. Moreover, it mentioned that the Ministry of Interior and Justice, through its Regional Coordination Group in the field of forced displacement, "has adopted different actions addressed at devising schemes to coordinate the policies formulated by the national entities and the actions taken by the regional entities in order to make a profound impact on the implementation of the policy on prevention and assistance of forced displacement". Furthermore, the State mentioned that “the issues related to the return to Rio Seco and Murillo shall be taken up according to the new guidelines of the return policy by means of the protocol that regulates these issues. The pending commitments related to these issues shall be included in the new scheme of the return protocol with 17 components agreed upon at the Constitutional Court [...]". Finally, the State informed that “in order to avoid any inconveniences in the transportation of the Kankuamo community, the National Army gave instructions so that the troop [,] by means of authorized channels [,] learns about and protects the community […] when it migrates, in light of its indigenous culture”. In addition, in order to maintain and increase the control over the roads “and the sense of security in the area, control posts were established in [several corregimientos]". 20. As to the right to freedom of movement of the members of the Kankuamo Indigenous Community, the representatives previously informed that on July 15, 2009, in the community of Guatapurí, Mr. Luis Manuel Montero Arias and Jose Enrique Cáceres Arias were arbitrarily detained by members of the State’s security department (DAS). Moreover, they emphasized that the indigenous members who decided to voluntarily return to their territories were not afforded the guarantees of security, protection and dignity necessary at the moment of carrying out this type of procedure. At the public hearing as well as in a subsequent brief, they specified that some people had returned to the communities of Murillo and Rio Seco, but that they were not afforded “full guarantees”. They also referred to the fact that there were "individual" returns without State’s escort. They expressed their concern about the current non-existence of mechanisms to prevent new forced displacements and they emphasized that it is still pending the implementation and availability of viable projects according to the indigenous traditions and customs guaranteeing collective self-sustaining processes within the framework of the returns. In addition, the representatives informed that, by means of the filing of an amparo, it was requested the protection of the rights of the indigenous people living in a situation of forced displacement in the city of Bogota and the allocation of a piece of land located in the municipality of Nilo, Department of Cundinamarca. They emphasized the importance of making an appraisal of the proposals taking into account the custom and usage of the beneficiaries. Finally, the representatives also made reference to some aspects related to the “socio-economic stabilization”, “humanitarian aid”, “the situation of displacement of the city of Bogota” of some members of the Kankuamo Indigenous Community and the need to “include in the population registry – SUR- a variable in order to identify the Kankuamo Indigenous People”. 10