CEJIL

CEJIL

- Libreria
- Registrarse

Anterior 94 / 135 Próximo

Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary So ordered Diego García-Sayán President Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary 94

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

● ● ●

Uwazi es desarrollado por
CEJIL
Libreria
Acceder

Información
15relaciones

Consejos de búsqueda

Buscar texto

Type something in the search box to get some results.

Tabla de Contenidos

I INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE AND PURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE3
II ROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT5
III COMPETENCE6
IV PARTIAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY BY THE STATE6
A. Partial acknowledgement of responsibility by the Stateand observationsof the Commissionand the representatives6
B. Considerationsof the Court8
V PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS9
VI EVIDENCE11
A.Documentary, testimonial,and expert evidence11
B.Admission of the evidence13
VII PROVEN FACTS14
A.Context15
1.The referendum calledonApril 7, 1997,and the amendments tothe Constitution enacted on July 23,1997 15
2.The Constitution adopted by the National Constituent Assembly in199816
3.The appointment of the members of the Constitutional Tribunalin200317
B.The termination of the members of the Constitutional Tribunalowing to the presumed illegality of the way they were appointed during the sessionof November 25,200319
C.Facts related to the impeachment of some members of the Constitutional Tribunal23
1.Processing of theimpeachments under the laws in force at the time of the facts23
2.Rulings of the Constitutional TribunalNo. 0004-2003-TC of April 29,2003,and No. 025-2003-TC of February 17, 20042
3.The motions of censure against the members of the Constitutional Tribunal26
4.The vote on the motions of censure in the impeachment proceeding ofDecember 1,200428
5.The vote on the motions of censure during the sessionof December 8,200430
D.The Constitutional Tribunal’s decision on the inadmissibility of actions for amparoagainst decisions of Congress33
E.Refusal to admit the remedies of amparofiled by severalmembers of the Constitutional Tribunalwho were terminated34
F.Events following the dismissals from the high courts of Ecuador36
VIII JUDICIAL GUARANTEES, THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGALITY, POLITICAL RIGHTS, DOMESTIC LEGAL EFFECTS,EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW, ANDJUDICIAL PROTECTION39
A.Arguments of the Commission and of the parties39
1.Arguments onjudicial independence, competence, and political rights39
2.Arguments on the nature of the termination decision41
3.Arguments onthe scope of the judicial guarantees established inArticle8of the American Convention2
4.Arguments onthe right to a hearingand the right of defense42
5.Arguments on the obligation to provide the reasoning43
6.Arguments onimpartiality43
7.Arguments onthe right to appeal the judgment2
8.Arguments onthe principle of legality44
9.Arguments onthe right not to be tried twice for the same facts2
10.Arguments onArticles1(1)and 2of the Convention45
11.Arguments onjudicial protection46
12.Arguments onequality47
B.Considerationsof the Court2
1.The Inter-American Court’s case law on judicial guarantees inimpeachment proceedings48
2.The violation of judicial guarantees in relation tothe termination of the judgesand the impeachment proceedings against them50
2.1.Legal grounds and competence to declare the termination50
2.2.Possibility of being heard and exercising the right of defense,and the “ne bis in idem” principle53
2.2.1.Rightsto a hearingandof defenseduring the termination procedure on November 25,200453
2.2.2.“Ne bis in idem,”right to a hearing,and right of defenseduring the impeachment proceedings54
3.Judicial independence55
3.1.General standards ofjudicial independence55
3.2.The sanction of the judges based on the judgments they delivered60
3.3.Institutional aspect of judicial independence, separation of powers, and democracy61
3.4.Conclusion of the Court on judicial guarantees and political rights67
4.Judicial protection69
5.Equality before the law72
IX REPARATIONS73
A.Injured party74
B. Measures of satisfaction and restitution, and guarantees of non-repetition75
1.Measures of satisfaction: publication of the Judgment75
2.Measures of restitution75
3.Guarantees of non-repetition–amendment of domestic laws77
C.Compensation forpecuniary and non-pecuniary damage80
1.Pecuniary damage80
1.1.Calculation of the pecuniary damage of thetitularmembers82
1.2.Analysis of the situation of the alternatememberManuel Jaramillo Córdova84
1.3.Request for payment of interest3
2.Non-pecuniary damage86
D. Other measures of reparation88
E.Costs and expenses3
F.Method of complying with the payments ordered91
X OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS92
PARTIALLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE EDUARDO FERRER MAC-GREGOR POISOT 95

Tribunal Constitucional (Camba Campos y otros). Sentencia de 28 de agosto de 2013

Sentencia de la Corte IDH

Preview

Tipo

Costas
Excepciones Preliminares
Fondo
Reparaciones

Fecha: 28 ago 2013

Mecanismo

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Número: C-268

País

Ecuador

Firmantes

Alberto Pérez Pérez
Diego García-Sayán
Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot
Eduardo Vio Grossi
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Manuel E. Ventura Robles
Roberto de Figueiredo Caldas

Votos separados

Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot

Documentos primarios

Tribunal Constitucional (Camba Campos y otros). Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 28 de agosto de 2013.pdf
Spanish
Descargar Ver
Constitutional Tribunal (Camba Campos et al). Judgment August 28, 2013.pdf
English
Descargar Ver

Archivos de soporte

Constitutional Tribunal (Camba Campos et al). Judgment August 28, 2013.doc1.04 MB

Tribunal Constitucional (Camba Campos y otros). Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 28 de agosto de 2013.doc384.78 kB

Sin referencias

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

Firmantes6
- Juez/a y/o Comisionado/a6
País1
- País1
Firmante Voto separado1
- Juez/a y/o Comisionado/a1
Mecanismo1
- Organismo1
Votos separados1
- Voto Separado1
No existe etiqueta1
- Causa1
Documentos de la CorteIDH4
- Resolución de Presidencia de la CorteIDH1
- Resolución de la Corte IDH1
- Audiencia2

Crear Referencia

Seleccionar tipo de relación

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Consejos de búsqueda

Conectar a un párrafo

Connect to an entity

Disable highlights

Añadir a la tabla de contenidos

Notificaciones

Estás al día

La actividad nueva se mostrará aquí.