VIII OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 314. Therefore, THE COURT DECIDES, Unanimously that: 1. The State is responsible for the violation of the right to equality and nondiscrimination enshrined in Article 24, in conjunction with Article 1.1 of the American Convention on Human Rights, to the detriment of Karen Atala Riffo, under the terms of paragraphs 94 to 99, 107 to 146 and 218 to 222 of this Judgment. Unanimously that: 2. The State is responsible for the violation of the right to equality and nondiscrimination enshrined in Article 24, in conjunction with Articles 19 and 1.1. of the American Convention, to the detriment of the girls M., V. and R., under the terms of paragraphs 150 to 155 of this Judgment. Unanimously that: 3. The State is responsible for the violation of the right to privacy enshrined in Article 11.2, in conjunction with Article 1.1. of the American Convention, to the detriment of Karen Atala Riffo, under the terms of paragraphs 161 to 167 and 225 to 230 of this Judgment. Judge Diego García-Sayán and Judges Margarette May Macaulay and Rhadys Abreu Blondet voted in favor of the following operative paragraph. Judges Manuel E. Ventura Robles, Leonardo A. Franco and Alberto Pérez Pérez voted against. Therefore, pursuant to Articles 23.3 of the Statute of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and 16.4 of the Rules of Procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, it is decided that: 4. The State is responsible for the violation of Articles 11.2 and 17.1, in conjunction with Article 1.1 of the American Convention to the detriment of Karen Atala Riffo and of the girls M., V. and R., under the terms of paragraphs 168 to 178 of this Judgment. Unanimously that: 5. The State is responsible for the violation of the right to be heard enshrined in Article 8.1, in conjunction with Articles 19 and 1.1 of the American Convention to the detriment of the girls M., V. and R., under the terms of paragraphs 196 to 208 of this Judgment. Unanimously that: 87