persons indicated in paragraphs 147 and 150 of this judgment, in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 140 to 150 hereof. 6. The State is responsible for the violation of the right to freedom of movement and residence, recognized in Article 22(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of the persons indicated in paragraph 168 of this judgment, in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 162 to 168 hereof. In addition, the State is responsible for the violation of the right to special protection of minors, established in Article 19 of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Articles 1(1) and 22(1) of this instrument, to the detriment of the minors indicated in paragraph 168 of this judgment. 7. The State is responsible for the violation of the rights to judicial guarantees and to judicial protection established in Articles 8(1) and 25(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of the persons indicated in paragraphs 245, 249, 256, 260, 263, 266, 272 and 285 of this judgment, as established in paragraphs 173 to 181, 233 to 239, 241 to 285 hereof. 8. The State is responsible for failing to comply with Articles 6 and 8 of the InterAmerican Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture, to the detriment of Rigoberto Barrios and Jorge Antonio Barrios, in accordance with paragraph 260 of the judgment. 9. The State is responsible for the violation of the right to personal integrity, established in Article 5(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 1(1) thereof, to the detriment of the next of kin indicated in paragraphs 304 and 312 of this judgment, in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 301 to 312 hereof. AND DECIDES, Unanimously, that: 1. This judgment constitutes, per se, a form of reparation. 2. The State must conduct an effective criminal investigation into the facts of this case in order to clarify them, to determine the corresponding criminal responsibilities, and to apply the punishments and consequences provided for by law, as established in paragraphs 322 to 324 of this judgment. 3. The State must examine, in accordance with the pertinent disciplinary norms, the possible procedural and investigative irregularities related to this case and, as appropriate, sanction the conduct of the corresponding public servants, as established in paragraph 325 of this judgment. 4. The State must provide medical and psychological care, free of charge and immediately, through its specialized public health institutions to the victims who request this, as established in paragraphs 329 and 330 of this judgment. 5. The State must make the publications ordered, as established in paragraph 332 of this judgment. 6. The State must organize a public act to acknowledge its international responsibility for the facts of this case, as established in paragraph 334 of this judgment. 116