2 beneficiaries of the provisional measures so ordered. In said comments the representatives shall accurately specify if there is a continuing situation of extreme gravity and urgency calling for actions to avoid irreparable damage to persons in order that the Court may determine the need to maintain said protection measures. If within six months from the date this Order is served no information has been furnished, the Court shall decide on the rescission of the provisional measures 3. To call upon the State to submit, no later than June 9, 2008, a report on the implementation of the provisional measures, in particular, detailed information on the risk situation of each beneficiary of the provisional measures, the protection measures adopted in relation to them and the current status and results of the ongoing investigations of the events that gave rise to said measures. After submission of said report, the State must keep the Inter-American Court informed on a two-month basis of the provisional measures adopted. 4. To call upon the representatives of the beneficiaries of the provisional measures and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to submit comments on the reports furnished by the State in compliance with the previous operative paragraph within the term of four and six months, respectively, as from service thereof. […] 4. The President of the Court’s Order of November 26, 2008 in which she convened the Inter-American Commission, the Republic of Colombia (hereinafter “the State” or “Colombia”), and the representatives of the beneficiaries of the present provisional measures to a public hearing at the Court’s seat on January 20, 2009 with the aim of obtaining information from the State regarding compliance with the Judgment, hearing observations from the Commission and the representatives in that regard, and receiving information on the implementation and effectiveness of the provisional measures and the necessity of maintaining them in force. 5. The parties’ arguments at the public hearing on the present provisional measures held on January 19, 2009 during the LXXXII Regular Session of the Court at its seat.1 6. The State’s briefs of April 6 and July 8, 2009 as well as those of January 15, May 3, and July 30, 2010 whereby the State submitted information on the implementation of provisional measures. The State reemphasized its request to rescind the present provisional measures in one of its briefs. 7. The briefs of February 12 and August 6, 2009 as well as those of April 28 and July 26, 2010 whereby the representatives of the beneficiaries (hereinafter “the representatives”) submitted information on the implementation of provisional measures and on the alleged serious acts that placed “at risk and threatened the lives and right to humane treatment of the beneficiaries Sara Paola Pinzón López and Viviana Barrera Cruz.” 1 The Court delegated a panel of judges to conduct the hearing made up of Presiding Judge Diego García Sayán, Margarette May Macaulay, and Manuel Ventura Robles. In this hearing, the following persons participated as members of their respective delegations: for the Inter-American Commission: Elizabeth Abi-Mershed, Deputy Executive Secretary; Juan Pablo Albán Alencastro, Adviser; Lilly Ching Soto, Adviser; for the victims and beneficiaries: Eduardo Carreño Wilches and Rafael Barrios Mendivil from the José Alvear Restrepo Lawyer Collective; as well as Michael Camillieri and Francisco Quintana from the Center for Justice and International Law (CEJIL); for the State of Colombia: Ángela Margarita Rey, Director of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law, Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Carlos Franco, Director of the Presidential Program on Human Rights; Colonel Juan Carlos Gómez, Director of Human Rights, Ministry of National Defense; Juana Acosta López, Coordinator of the Inter-Institutional Operative Group, Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Generoso Hutchinson, Special Prosecutor for Human Rights, Attorney General’s Office; Diana Bravo R., Assistant to the Director of Human Rights, Ministry of Foreign Affairs; and General Jorge Rodríguez, Chief of the Office of the Joint Institutional Defense Command of the Armed Forces.