47. Based on the information provided by the parties, the Court concludes that the webpage to search for children abducted and illegally held has yet to be created and, the State specifically mentioned the difficulties it faced to comply with this measure of reparation. According to paragraph 274 of the judgment, this measure should have been implemented within one year of notification of the judgment. In this regard, the Court considers it essential that the State adopt the necessary measures and allocate the human, financial, logistic and any other resources required to create the webpage, so that it functions satisfactorily and fulfills the purpose for which it was created, in keeping with paragraphs 271, 272 and 273 of the judgment. In order to monitor compliance with this obligation, in its next report, the State must indicate the measures it has taken and will take to create the webpage and, if appropriate, the results obtained. J) Payments for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs (eighteenth operative paragraph of the judgment) 48. In its report of December 17, 2010, the State indicated that, after verifying the identification documents forwarded by the legal representatives on December 14 and 15, 2010, it “determined that several of the names on the identification documents submitted differed from the names indicated in the said judgment.” It indicated that, in order to be able to make the payment and comply with all the requirements of the Guatemalan public administration auditing bodies, “the identity of the beneficiary” must be duly verified; therefore, it asked the Court to rule in this regard. In its following report, dated December 21, 2010, the State indicated that “after obtaining the funds from a deficit national budget, it had been able to allocate them and payment will be made before December 31, 2010.” 49. In its report of May 16, 2011, the State indicated that, on December 27, 2010, and January 13 and April 14, 2011, it had paid a total of 115 beneficiaries, as well as the costs and expenses of the legal representatives from [...] FAMDEGUA. It added that, at May 4, 2011, “13 people [were yet to be paid]; but their cheques have already been prepared, together with the payment certifications, and all that remains pending is that these beneficiaries contact COPREDEH to arrange the date of payment. Consequently, the State asks the Court, through the legal representatives, to locate these people and forward their requested identification documents.” It also indicated that it had not been able to contact a group of seven people, so that it did not have their personal data and it had not been possible to prepare the cheque and the settlement agreement in order to make the payment. In addition, it indicated that, based on the documents forwarded by the representatives, it had taken note that 20 beneficiaries were deceased and, as it had informed the representatives of FAMDEGUA, in accordance with domestic provisions, “their next of kin must carry out the intestacy inheritance procedures established in Guatemalan law, [because this] is required for the heirs to receive the corresponding financial compensation.” 50. In response to the Secretariat’s communication of May 30, 2011, the State submitted the following updated information on July 4, 2011: (a) regarding the payment to Rodrigo Mayén Ramírez, it forwarded copies of the corresponding cheque and certification; (b) after May 9, 2011, it had paid six beneficiaries, and forwarded the corresponding cheques and certifications of payment; thus, according to the State, 121 beneficiaries have received the respective payment of compensation; (c) it had noted the death of two beneficiaries: Merigilda Marroquín Miranda and Rafael Barrientos Mazariegos, and reported that the cheque and the certification issued in favor of the latter would be canceled due to his decease, and (d) that six beneficiaries, 14