Cassation through the judgment of October 7, 2013. 114 103. On May 27, 2016, the Oral Court issued its verdict in cases 1504, 1951, 2054, and 1976, whose reasoning was read out on August 9, 2016. In that judgment, the judges confirmed, among other facts, that Ms. Grisonas Andrijauskaite “was illegally deprived of her liberty,” “was transferred [to] Automotores Orletti […] [where] she was subjected to torture and inhuman detention conditions,” and, “[to] date, she remains missing”. Based on this, one of the defendants was sentenced 115 (infra para. 171). The judgment was upheld by Court IV of the Federal Chamber of Criminal Cassation on May 4, 2018. 116 104. On September 11, 2017, the Oral Court delivered its verdict in cases 2261 and 2390. The reasoning was issued on November 3, 2017. The judgment held as proven, among other facts, that Ms. Grisonas Andrijauskaite “was illegally deprived of her liberty […] during an operation […] carried out by […] members of the Argentine Army and personnel from the Department of Foreign Affairs of the Federal Police.” “[Later] she was transferred [to] Automotores Orletti together with her children,” and “[…] she remains missing.” Based on this, two of the defendants were sentenced 117 (infra para. 172). 105. Within the framework of the same process, the Oral Court acquitted the defendants for the “homicide” of Julien Cáceres. In this regard, the judgment found that on the day of the operation, Julien Cáceres “escaped through the back of the house where he lived,” but “was apprehended and transferred to the corner of Carlos Gardel […] and Miter streets, at which location […] he was ‘gunned down.’” The judges argued that “[they] could not find that the murder was part of the ‘shared plan’ designed by the State’s repressive forces, within the framework of the ‘anti-subversive struggle.'” Consequently, “in view of a possible 'deviation' from the ‘shared plan' […] they did not […] have evidence proving the defendants’ involvement in that murder.” 118 106. For its part, on February 27, 2019, Court IV of the Federal Chamber of Criminal Cassation partially annulled the ruling “as regards the incident that caused harm to” Julien Cáceres, and upheld the rest of the decision. Thus, the Chamber ordered “[to return] the […] proceedings to the a quo court for review.” 119 The defense attorneys filed extraordinary appeals against this decision, which were denied by the same court. 120 In response, the defense filed a motion for reconsideration of dismissal of appeal, which is awaiting a decision by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation. In view of the foregoing, in September 2019, the Oral Court ruled that “the jurisdictional body shall not rule [...] until the final judgment […] is issued, as indicated by the Chamber.” 121 Cf. Official communication dated July 15, 2020 issued by the Prosecutor of the Office of the Prosecutor for Crimes against Humanity of the Office of the Public Prosecutor of the Nation (evidence file, volume IV, annex 17 to the answering brief, folio 12344), and official communication dated July 17, 2020 issued by National Federal Criminal and Correctional Court No. 3 (evidence file, volume IV, annex 14 to the answering brief, folio 11000). 115 Cf. Judgment issued by Federal Oral Criminal Court No. 1 on August 9, 2016, case No. 1504, 1951, 2054, and 1976 (evidence file, volume IV, annex 8 to the answering brief, folios 7579, 7580 and 8850). 116 Cf. Judgment issued by Court IV of the Federal Chamber of Criminal Cassation on May 4, 2018, case No. 13445/1999 (evidence file, volume IV, annex 17 to the answering brief, folios 14231 to 14233). 117 Cf. Judgment issued by Federal Oral Criminal Court No. 1 on November 3, 2017, cases 2261 and 2390 (evidence file, volume IV, annex 13 to the answering brief, folios 10347, 10348, and 10977). 118 Cf. Judgment issued by Federal Oral Criminal Court No. 1 on November 3, 2017, cases 2261 and 2390 (evidence file, volume IV, annex 13 to the answering brief, folios 10514, 10768, 10779, 10780, 10784, and 10979). 119 Cf. Judgment issued by Court IV of the Federal Chamber of Criminal Cassation on February 27, 2019, case No. 2637/2004 (evidence file, volume IV, annex 17 to the answering brief, folios 14445, 14449, and 14488). 120 Cf. Order issued by Court IV of the Federal Chamber of Criminal Cassation on July 5, 2019, case No. 2637/2004 (evidence file, volume IV, annex 17 to the answering brief, folios 14489 to 14495). 121 Cf. Resolution issued by Federal Oral Criminal Court No. 1 in September 2019, case No. 2261 (evidence file, volume IV, annex VII to the pleadings and motions brief, folios 2749 and 2750). 114 30