INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CASE OF OSORIO RIVERA AND FAMILY MEMBERS V. PERU JUDGMENT OF NOVEMBER 20, 2014 (Interpretation of the Judgment on Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs) In the case of Osorio Rivera and family members, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court” or “the Court”) composed of the following judges: Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto, President; Roberto F. Caldas, Vice President; Manuel E. Ventura Robles, Judge; Eduardo Vio Grossi, Judge, and Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot, Judge; also present, Pablo Saavedra Alessandri, Secretary, and Emilia Segares Rodríguez, Deputy Secretary, pursuant to Article 67 of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter also “the American Convention” or “the Convention”) and Article 68 of the Court’s Rules of Procedure (hereinafter also “the Rules of Procedure”), decides on the request for interpretation of the Judgment on Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs issued by this Court in this case on November 26, 2013 (hereinafter also “the judgment”), filed on March 12, 2021, by the victim’s representative (hereinafter also “the representative”) and on March 21, 2014, by the Republic of Peru (hereinafter “the Peruvian state,” “the State,” or “Peru”). Judge Diego García-Sayán, a Peruvian national, did not take part in the hearing of this case or the deliberation of this Judgment, in accordance with the provisions of Article 19(1) of the Court’s Rules of Procedure. Judge Alberto Pérez Pérez, who was part of the Court’s composition when the decision on preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs was issued, did not participate, for reasons of force majeure, in the deliberation and signing of this judgment. 