endorses this measure in the terms agreed between the parties. The Court also finds, as it has in other cases, 270 that, in this act reference must be made to the human rights violations declared in this Judgment and an apology offered for the events of this case. To this end, Argentina must reach agreement with the victims or their representatives on the organization of this public act of acknowledgement and its characteristics, and also provide the victims, among other elements, with the necessary facilities of transport and logistics in this regard. The State has one year from notification of this Judgment to hold this act. C.1.2. Publication and dissemination of the Judgment 159. The representatives asked the Court to order the State to disseminate the Judgment in this case widely. They also asked that the acknowledgement of responsibility be published in two of the country’s most important newspapers and on the web page of the Centro de Información Judicial (CIJ, www.cij.gov.ar) [the news agency of the Judiciary]. They indicated that this acknowledgement should be accompanied by an account of the series of irregularities and obstructions of justice that resulted in impunity in this case. Neither the Commission nor the State referred to this point specifically. 160. The Court establishes, as it has in other cases, 271 that the State must publish, within six months of notification of this Judgment, the official summary of the Judgment prepared by the Court, once, in the Official Gazette, and in a national newspaper with widespread circulation. Argentina must also publish the Judgment in its entirety for at least 12 consecutive months on the website of the Centro de Información Judicial (CIJ, www.cij.gov.ar), as well as on the official websites of the Argentine Federal Police and of the Police of the province of Buenos Aires. C.1.3. Measures to conserve and indicate the warehouse and the police precinct where the events occurred 161. In the Agreement reached with the representatives, the State undertook “to adopt measures to conserve and indicate the warehouse and the police precinct where the events occurred that gave rise to this case.” The Commission did not refer to this point. 162. The Court assesses positively the undertaking made by the State, aimed at recovering the memory of Jorge Omar Gutiérrez. Consequently, the Court endorses this measure agreed between the parties and orders the State to implement it within one year of notification of the Judgment. C.1.4. Establishment of the “National Day to Combat Drug-trafficking” 163. In the Agreement reached with the representatives, the State undertook “to establish August 29 as the ‘National Day to Combat Drug-trafficking.’” The Commission did not refer to this point. 164. The Court appreciates the State’s willingness to establish August 29 as the “National Day to Combat Drug-trafficking” as a measure of satisfaction, and takes note of this commitment. The Court will not monitor implementation of this measure during the procedure of monitoring compliance with the Judgment. 270 Cf. inter alia, Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Reparations and costs. Judgment of December 3, 2001. Series C No. 88, para. 81, and Case of Nadege Dorzema et al., supra, para. 265. 271 Cf. Case of Barrios Altos v. Peru. Reparations and costs. Judgment of November 30, 2001. Series C No. 87, paras. 42 and 45, and Case of Luna López, supra, para. 224. 56