psychological and physical nature and on their life project, as well as other possible changes in their social relationships and in their family and community dynamics,348 particularly in the case of an indigenous community. This Court has established that this type of harm is increased by the lack of support from State authorities in the search for and identification of the remains of deceased victims, and the impossibility for the next of kin to honor their loved ones appropriately.349 Accordingly, the Court has considered the need to grant diverse measures of reparation in order to redress the harm comprehensively; thus, in addition to the pecuniary compensations, measures of satisfaction, restitution, and rehabilitation and guarantees of non-repetition are especially relevant owing to the gravity of the effects and the collective nature of the harm caused350 in this case. C.1. Measures of satisfaction C.1.1. Publication and dissemination of the Judgment 273. The Commission asked, in general, that the State be ordered to “[m]ake adequate reparation for the human rights violations declared in the [merits] report, [… for] nonpecuniary damage, including […] publication of the historical truth of the events.” For their part, the representatives requested the publication of the relevant parts of the judgment in the State’s official gazette and in another newspaper with widespread circulation, once, and within one year. They also requested the publication of the judgment, in Spanish and in the Maya Achí language, on the official websites of the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the State, as well as on the official webpage of the Presidential Commission for Coordination of the Executive’s Human Rights Policies (COPREDEH), for at least one year. In addition, they also the Court to establish, in equity, an amount for reproducing the judgment in the Maya Achí language and distributing it among the communities that inhabit the department of Baja Verapaz. In this regard, they asked that the said amount be sufficient to execute the project for three years, “in order to guarantee full dissemination.” The State undertook to “arrange with the Academy of Mayan Languages for the translation of the judgment” into the Maya Achí language, and to organize the reproduction and distribution requested by the representatives. It also undertook “to arrange with the three branches of State [… for the publication of the judgment] in Spanish and Achí for at least one year.” 274. The Court assesses positively and accepts the offer made by the State. Thus, and as ordered on other occasions,351 the State must publish once, in the Spanish and Maya Achí languages, in the official gazette and in another daily newspaper with national circulation, the official summary of this Judgment. In addition, as the Court has ordered on previous occasions, 352 this Judgment must be published in its entirety, in both languages, for at least one year, on an official website of the State. The translation of the Judgment must be approved by the representatives before being published. The publications in the newspapers 348 Cf. Case of the Pueblo Bello Massacre v. Colombia, supra, para. 256, and Case of the Dos Erres Massacre v. Guatemala, supra, para. 226. 349 Cf. Case of the Pueblo Bello Massacre v. Colombia, supra, para. 256, and Case of the Dos Erres Massacre v. Guatemala, supra, para. 226. 350 Cf. Case of the Mapiripán Massacre v. Colombia, supra, para. 294, and Case of the Dos Erres Massacre v. Guatemala, supra, para. 226. 351 Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Reparations and costs, supra, para. 79, and Case of the Kichwa Indigenous People of Sarayaku v. Ecuador, supra, para. 307. 352 Cf. Case of the Serrano Cruz Sisters v. El Salvador. Merits, reparations and costs, supra, para. 195, and Case of the Kichwa Indigenous People of Sarayaku v. Ecuador, supra, para. 307. 94