Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of August 27, 2010 Case of Ivcher Bronstein v. Peru Monitoring Compliance with Judgment Having Seen: 1. The Judgment on merits, reparations, and costs (hereinafter “the Judgment”) issued in the instant case by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Court” or “the Inter-American Court”) of February 6, 2001. 2. The Judgment on Interpretation of the Judgment on Merits of February 6, 2001, (supra Having Seen 1) issued by the Court on September 4, 2001. 3. The Orders of the Inter-American Court of June 1, 2001, and September 21, 2005, regarding Monitoring Compliance with Judgment in the instant case. 4. The Order of the Inter-American Court of November 24, 2009, regarding Monitoring of Compliance with Judgment in the instant case, whereby the Court declared that the procedure to monitor compliance with the outstanding operative paragraphs shall be kept open, namely: a) to investigate the fatcs that led to the violations set forth in the Judgment in order to identify and punish those responsible (operative paragraph seven of the Judgment of February 6, 2001); and, b) to facilitate the conditions to allow Baruch Ivcher Bronstein to take the necessary steps to regain the use and enjoyment of his rights as a majority shareholder of the Compañía Latinoamericana de Radiodifusión [Latin-American Radio-Diffusion Company S.A.], as was the case until August 1, 1997, in accordance with domestic legislation and competent authorities (operative paragraph eight of the Judgment of February 6, 2001).  Judge Diego García-Sayán, of Peruvian nationality, excused himself from hearing the monitoring of compliance with Judgment in the instant case, in conformity with Articles 19(2) of the Statute and 20 of the Court’s Rules of Procedure.