11 33. In this regard, the Court observes that the beneficiaries Salomón Flórez Contreras and Sandra Belinda Montero Fuentes expressly rejected the possibility of taking part in the State’s risk assessment study that was to help determine the most appropriate measures for their protection (supra Considering clause 29). Thus, the Court notes the beneficiaries’ remarks indicating that neither their lives nor their physical integrity are in danger at the present time. Additionally, the Tribunal notes that neither the representatives nor the Commission have put forth arguments supporting the continuation of provisional measures in favor of the beneficiaries. 34. Consequently, the Tribunal deems that the initial elements justifying the adoption of provisional measures in favor of Salomón Flórez Contreras, Sandra Belinda Montero Fuentes, and their respective families, no longer apply. For this reason, the Tribunal thinks it wise to proceed with their abatement. 35. Regarding the beneficiary Luis José Pundor Quintero, the Court observes that his current geographic location is outside the State of Colombia. Concurrent with this observation, the Court notes the representatives’ affirmations that the beneficiary wishes to return to Colombia and that he left to become an illegal alien in another country only because of the risks he would have continued to face had he stayed in Colombia (supra Considering clause 29(c)). Nonetheless, the Court points out that the representatives failed to offer sufficient, precise, and detailed information on this issue, nor did they make arguments relevant to the possible persistence of a situation of extreme gravity and urgency affecting the beneficiary and his family. 36. The Tribunal calls to mind that, in principle, when a beneficiary of provisional measures leaves the State that was supposed to protect him in order to reside in another state, the provisional measures he once enjoyed are rendered null.13 However, the Court notes that it has received information attesting to Mr. Luis José Pundor Quintero’s desire to return to Colombia. Thus, the Tribunal sees it as necessary that the representatives or Mr. Luis José Pundor Quintero himself provide information as to the genuine likelihood and disposition of the beneficiary and his family to return to Colombia and receive state protection. As a result, during the time that Mr. Luis José Pundor Quintero and his family continue to reside away from Colombia, and until they affirm their wish to return to Colombia, the precise dates in which they plan to do so, and their wish to receive state protection, the provisional measures in their favor will remain inchoate. Thus, the Court requests that the representatives submit to the Court complete and detailed information relating to the beneficiaries’ possible return to Colombia before the deadline stipulated in Operative Paragraph seven of the present Order. of Human Rights of February 2, 2010, Considering clause thirteen; and, Case of García Prieto et al. Provisional Measures regarding El Salvador, supra note 1, Considering clause nine. 13 Cf. Matter of Lysias Fleury. Provisional Measures regarding Haiti. Order of the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights of November 25, 2008, Considering clause eighteen; Case of the 19 Tradesmen v. Colombia. Monitoring Compliance with Judgment and Provisional Measures regarding Colombia, supra note 3, Considering clause eighty-one.