13. The Court does not have any evidence to conclude that Ms. J. was a victim of certain specific ill-treatment that is alleged to have occurred during her detention in DINCOTE or that the State has been advised of these facts at the domestic level, so that it has failed to comply with its obligation to investigate the said supposed facts, in accordance with paragraphs 372 to 375 of this Judgment. AND ESTABLISHES unanimously, that: 14. This Judgment constitutes per se a form of reparation. 15. The State must open and conduct effectively the criminal investigation into the acts committed against Ms. J. that violated personal integrity in order to determine the eventual criminal responsibilities and, as appropriate, apply the penalties and consequences established by law, taking into account the provisions of paragraphs 391 and 392 of this Judgment. 16. The State must award Ms. J., once, the amount established in paragraph 397 of the Judgment, for the expenses of psychological or psychiatric treatment, so that she may receive this care in her place of residence, should Ms. J. request this treatment. 17. The State must make the publications indicated in paragraph 398 of this Judgment, within nine months of its notification, in the terms of the said paragraphs of the Judgment. 18. The State must ensure that the proceedings underway against Ms. J. observe all the requirements of due process, with full guarantees of a hearing and defense for the accused, in accordance with paragraph 413 of this Judgment. 19. The State must pay the amounts established in paragraphs 417 and 423 of this Judgment, as compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, and to reimburse costs and expenses, in the terms of the said paragraphs of this Judgment. 20. The State must reimburse the Victim’s Legal Assistance Fund of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights the sum disbursed during the processing of this case, as established in paragraph 428 of this Judgment. 21. The State must provide the Court with a report on the measures adopted to comply with this Judgment within one year of its notification. 22. The Court will monitor full compliance with this Judgment, in exercise of its attributes and in fulfillment of its obligations under the American Convention on Human Rights, and will consider this case concluded when the State has complied fully with all its provisions. Done, at San José, Costa Rica, on November 27, 2013, in the Spanish language. Manuel E. Ventura Robles Acting President 126