10 24. In this regard, the Court reiterates that Article 1(1) of the American Convention sets forth the general obligations of States Parties to respect the rights and liberties enshrined in the Convention and to guarantee the free and full exercise of these rights for all individuals subject to their jurisdiction. Consequently, and independent of the existence of specific provisional measures, the State is particularly obliged to guarantee the rights of individuals in a situation of risk and must move forward with the investigations necessary to clear up the facts, followed by the consequences established in the pertinent legislation.12 THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, by way of the authority conferred by Article 63(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights and articles 27 and 31 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court, DECLARES THAT: 1. The deaths of Rigoberto Barrios, which took place on January 19, 2005; Oscar Barrios, which took place on November 28, 2009; and the recent death of Wilmer José Flores Barrios, which took place on September 1, 2010; make manifest the ineffectiveness of the provisional measures and therefore represent a grave failure on the part of the State to comply with the provisions of Article 63(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights. AND DECIDES TO: 2. Maintain the provisional measures ordered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights through its orders dated November 23, 2004, and June 29 and September 22, 2005, and February 4, 2010. 3. Require the State to immediately and effectively adopt all necessary and special measures to protect and guarantee the lives and personal integrity of the beneficiaries of these measures. 4. Require the State, among other measures necessary, to provide security to the homes of Maritza Barrios, Juan Barrios, and Orismar Carolina Alzul García with permanent security guards, without prejudice to the fact the parties can reach an agreement on more complete provisional measures in the framework of a dialogue between the beneficiaries and the State. Likewise, require the State to ensure and effectively implement the conditions necessary for the members of the Barrios family who have been forced to move to other regions of the country to return to their homes. 12 Cf. Case of Velásquez Rodríguez. Provisional Measures regarding Venezuela. Order of the Court of August 15, 1988, Considering 3; Matter of Giraldo Cardona et al. Provisional Measures regarding Colombia. Order of the Court of February 2, 2010, Considering 33, and Matter of Ramírez Hinostroza et al. Provisional Measures regarding Peru. Order of the Court of February 3, 2010, Considering 27.