9 30. The Commission indicated that it is waiting for the State to comply with this item of the Judgment as soon as possible and to submit the pertinent information. 31. The Court recognizes that, based on the information provided by the Parties, the State performed several steps to comply with this obligation. It observes that the parties agreed to perform an appraisal to determine the value of the losses incurred by Mr. Chaparro, based on which they agreed on a compensation amount. However, it also notes that the aforementioned agreement between the parties seems to have ended without complying with the instant obligation, and that currently both parties agree to submit the determination of the compensation owed to Mr. Chaparro to an arbitration court, in conformity with that indicated in paragraphs 232 and 233 of the Judgment. However, considering that the Court has not received information from the State in this regard, the Court requests the State to submit its observations, if any, on the information presented by Mr. Chaparro with regards to the creation of an arbitration court, within the term established in the operative section of this Order. * * * 32. With regards to the payment to Mr. Chaparro of the late interest corresponding to the pecuniary compensation of the administration fees and CONSEP charges, indicated in paragraph 245 of the Judgment (operative paragraph fourteen of the Judgment), the State indicated that the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights requested the Ministry of Finance, through communication No. 2454 of May 6, 2009, to issue the corresponding budget item in order to make the payment, and that it was “waiting for this amount to be transferred in order to perform the payment.” 33. The representatives observed that Mr. Chaparro “has not been paid the amounts corresponding to the late bank interest for reimbursement of the administration fees and CONSEP charges.” They stated that the payment of these amounts is still in process at the Ministry of Finance. 34. The Commission expressed that, in view of the information presented by the Sate, “it await[ed] information regarding compliance with this measure as soon as possible.” 35. The Court observes that the payment of late interest owed to Mr. Chaparro, in conformity with paragraph 245 of the Judgment, has not been performed. Based on the foregoing, it requests the State to report on the advances achieved to comply with this obligation within the term established in the operative section of the instant Judgment. * * * 36. In relation to the activities for education and training for public officials (paragraph 273 of the Judgment), the representatives expressed that “[t]he State of Ecuador has not said anything about this point,” and that “it is necessary to request the State to comply with this obligation.” 37. The Court calls to mind that in the instant case it was deemed pertinent to “reiterate the measures for education and training […] already ordered in the Case of Tibi v. Ecuador.” This reiteration does not constitute the establishment of a new obligation, therefore the Court considers that compliance with the referred measures for education and training of public officials shall be assessed within the framework of the monitoring compliance with Judgment issued by the Court in that case, and not in relation to the instant Judgment.