- 31 decision,153 which was rejected by the Personnel Management Directorate on April 9 based on its absolute lack of competence to “intervene, at any stage of the processing of an action of unconstitutionality.”154 93. On April 20, 2010, the Personnel Management Directorate recommended to the Supreme Court that it should: Dismiss, with no liability for the institution, attorney ADAN GUILLERMO LOPEZ LONE, […] owing to non-compliance with or serious or repeated violation of some of the duties, incompatibilities and conducts established in Chapters X and XI of the Judicial Service Act, because he had played an active part in the violent demonstration held near the “TONCONTIN” Airport on July 5, 2009, […] a conduct that was incompatible with the ethical principles and the legal norms that govern the actions of public officials.155 94. On May 5, 2010, the plenum of the Supreme Court of Justice approved the Personnel Management Directorate’s recommendation concerning the removal of Mr. López Lone and appointed a committee of three justices “to draw up the corresponding resolution and then to issue the corresponding decision on his removal.”156 The case file contains a resolution of the same date, signed by the President and the Secretary of the Supreme Court that, apparently following up on the orders of the plenum of the Court, sets out “the corresponding grounds, which have been approved, adding the date of the plenary meeting.”157 Nevertheless, the decision was not notified to Mr. López Lone.158 On May 21, 2010, the presumed victims presented a joint request for reconsideration of their sanctions of dismissal before the Supreme Court, indicating that they had become aware of the May 5 decisions through the media, but had not received the corresponding resolutions.159 95. On June 16, 2010, the Supreme Court issued a ruling on the dismissal, citing the following grounds: THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE HEREBY DECIDES: 1. To dismiss, without any liability to the institution, attorney ADAN GUILLERMO LOPEZ LONE from the post of Judge of the Sentencing Court of the San Pedro Sula Judicial District, Department of Cortés, for serious or repeated non-compliance with or violation of some of the duties, incompatibilities and conduct established in Chapters X and XI of the Judicial Service Act, by virtue of his having played an active part in the political demonstration staged near “TONCONTIN” Airport on July 153 Cf. Brief received on April 6, 2010, signed by Adán Guillermo López Lone addressed to the Director of Personnel Management (evidence file, folios 375 to 377). 154 Decision of the Director of Personnel Management of April 9, 2010 (evidence file, folio 378). 155 This recommendation was made “in application of Articles 80, 82, 319, of the Constitution of the Republic 1, 3, 4 (2) 10, 12 (a), 44, 51, 53 (g), 55, 56 (3), 60, 64 (a), 66, 73, 74 and 77 of the Judicial Service Act; 1, 3, 7, 9 (4), 31, 33 (a), 149, 161, 172 (f), 174, 180 (3), 184, 186, 187 (a), 188, 189, 190, 206, 207 and 210 of the Regulations governing that Act; 3 (6) of the Law on the Organization and Faculties of the Courts, 1 (d) of the Code of Ethics for Judicial Officials and Employees.” Resolution No. 172-2010 of the Personnel Management Directorate of April 20, 2010 (evidence file, folios 350 and 351). 156 This decision is included in Minutes No. 24 of the meeting of the plenum of the Supreme Court of Justice that began on May 5, 2010, and concluded on May 7, 2010. The minutes were not notified to the presumed victims; rather a certified copy was issued at the request of Ramón Enrique Barrios and Tirza Flores Lanza on June 25, 2010 (evidence file, folios 5645 and 5646). 157 Ruling of the Supreme Court of Justice of May 5, 2010 (evidence file, folios 352, 358 and 359). 158 The victims and their representatives have repeatedly asserted that they were not notified of the said resolutions. The State has not contested this assertion and there is no record in the disciplinary files that these resolutions were notified to them. 159 Cf. Brief with appeal for reconsideration received on May 21, 2011, signed by Adán Guillermo López Lone, Luis Alonso Chévez de la Rocha, Ramón Enrique Barrios and Tirza Flores Lanza and addressed to the Supreme Court of Justice (evidence file, folios 1127 and 1128).