8 26. Mr. Chaparro indicated that “[t]he information provided by the State is correct […]” and that, consequently, he had “now received payment of the [pending] amounts.” 27. The Commission indicated that it “notes compliance with this measure of reparation with satisfaction.” 28. The Court observes that the parties confirm payment of the interest on arrears owed to Mr. Chaparro according to paragraph 245 of the judgment. Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that the State has complied entirely with the fourteenth operative paragraph of the judgment. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercise of its authority to monitor compliance with its decisions and in accordance with Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, 25(1) and 30 of its Statute, and 31 and 69 of its Rules of Procedure,6 DECLARES THAT: 1. As indicated in the twenty-eighth considering paragraph of this order, the State has complied fully with the obligation to pay Mr. Chaparro the bank interest on arrears in Ecuador as indicated in paragraph 245 of the judgment (fourteenth operative paragraph of the judgment). 2. The State has complied partially with the obligation to broadcast the judgment by radio and television (tenth operative paragraph of the judgment), as indicated in the tenth considering paragraph of this order. 3. It will maintain the monitoring proceedings open until the State has complied with the pending aspects of this case, in accordance with considering paragraphs 10, 11, 15, 22, 23 and 24, namely: a) To broadcast the judgment by radio and television (tenth operative paragraph of the judgment); b) To take forthwith all the legislative, administrative or other measures necessary to eliminate ex officio the criminal record of those persons who have been acquitted or whose cases have been dismissed (twelfth operative paragraph of the judgment), and c) To submit to an arbitration procedure to establish the amounts corresponding to pecuniary damage for Mr. Chaparro (thirteenth operative paragraph of the judgment). AND DECIDES: 6 2009. Rules of Procedure approved by the Court at its eighty-fifth regular session held from November 16 to 28,