76 updated subsequently based on new costs and expenses incurred due to the proceedings before this Court.”263 303. Regarding the expenses incurred in at a domestic level, the representatives referred only to “[e]xpenses for domestic jurisdiction” for US$ 25,000, and in what refers to the expenses incurred in at an international level to “[t]rips to Washington D.C., during the proceedings before the Commission” for US$ 10,000; “[c]ommunications” for US$ 1,500; “[p]aperworks and deliveries” for US$ 1,500; and “[l]egal fees” for US$ 2,000. Additionally, they referred to “[e]xpenses for the proceedings” before this Court, for US$ 10,000. The Court verified that the representatives did not provide evidence regarding the mentioned expenses and that the only receipts sent for these expenses correspond to the disbursements made by the Legal Aid Fund for Victims. Therefore, the Court does not have the evidentiary support necessary to determine the expenses incurred in. 304. Thus, the Court decides to set a total of US$ 10,000 (ten thousand dollars of the United States of America), for the tasks carried out in the litigation of the case both nationally and internationally, which the State must pay to the representatives in a six-month period as of the notification of this judgment. The Court considers that, in the monitoring of compliance of this judgment, it may order the State to reimburse the victims or their representatives for the reasonable expenses incurred in by them in that procedural stage. G. Reimbursement of expenses to the Legal Aid Fund for Victims 305. The Garífuna Community of Triunfo de la Cruz and its members, through their representatives, requested support from the Court’s Legal Aid Fund for Victims to “cover funds for the litigation in this case, due to the lack of economic possibilities to face the expenses generated from it,” specifically “those related to air transportation, lodging, and food for the victim’s representative and the witnesses accepted by the […] Court.” 306. Through a Resolution of December 18, 2013, the President of the Court accepted the request filed by the victims and approved the granting of the economic help necessary for the assistance of a maximum of two representatives and the presentation of a maximum of three statements, either at the hearing or through affidavit. 307. According to the information included in the report on disbursements made in this case, they ascended to USD$ 1,677.97 (one thousand six hundred and seventy-seven dollars and ninety-seven cents of the United States of America). The State had the opportunity, up to October 2, 2014, to present its observations to the disbursements made in this case and, through its brief of that same date, informed “it did not have any observations to make.” 308. It corresponds to the Court, in application of Article 5 of the Rules of Procedure of the Fund, to assess the requirements for ordering the respondent State the reimbursement to the Legal Aid Fund for Victims of the disbursements in which it has incurred. Based on the violations declared in this judgment, the Court orders the State the reimbursement to that Fund of the amount of US $ 1,677.97 (one thousand six hundred and seventy-seven dollars and ninety-seven cents of the United States of America) for the expenses incurred in. This amount must be reimbursed to the Inter-American Court in a ninety-day period as of the notification of this judgment. Case of Chaparro Álvarez and Lapo Íñiguez v. Ecuador, para. 275, and Case of Omar Humberto Maldonado Vargas et al. v. Chile, para. 182. 263