287. The sums allocated in this judgment as compensation and to reimburse costs and expenses shall be delivered to the persons indicated in full, as established in this judgment, without any deductions resulting from possible taxes or charges. 288. If the State incurs a delay, it shall pay interest on the amount owed corresponding to banking interest on arrears in the Republic of Guatemala. 289. In accordance with its consistent practice, the Court reserves the authority inherent in its attributes and derived, also, from Article 65 of the American Convention, to monitor full compliance with this judgment. The case will be closed when the State has complied fully with the provisions of this judgment. 290. Within one year of notification of this judgment, the State shall provide the Court with a report on the measures taken to comply with it. IX OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS Therefore, THE COURT DECIDES, Unanimously, 1. To reject the preliminary objection concerning the alleged lack of jurisdiction ratione materiae filed by the State, in accordance with paragraph 19 of this judgment. 2. To reject the preliminary objection concerning the alleged failure to exhaust domestic remedies filed by the State, in accordance with paragraphs 23 to 28 of this judgment. DECLARES, Unanimously, that: 3. The State violated its obligation to ensure the free and full exercise of the rights to life and personal integrity recognized in Articles 4(1) and 5(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to the general obligation to ensure rights established in Article 1(1) and in relation to the obligation to adopt domestic legal provisions established in Article 2 of this instrument, as well as to the obligations established in Article 7 of the Inter-American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment and Eradication of Violence against Women, to the detriment of Claudina Isabel Velásquez Paiz, in accordance with paragraphs 105 to 134 of this judgment. Unanimously, that: 4. The State violated the rights to judicial guarantees and judicial protection, recognized in Articles 8(1) and 25(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, and the right to equality before the law recognized in Article 24 of the Convention, in relation to the general obligations established in Articles 1(1) and 2 of this instrument, and Article 7 of the Inter-American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment and Eradication of Violence against Women, to the detriment of Elsa Claudina Paiz Vidal, Jorge Rolando Velásquez Durán and Pablo Andrés 93