the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights, representatives of the victims and the next-of-kin of Mr. Anzualdo Castro, a "Coordination Act in order to carry out a public apology ceremony,” which set July 23, 2013, as the date to carry out the corresponding ceremony at the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights, in accordance with the terms established by the Judgment on Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs of September 22, 2009. Subsequently, on August 13, 2013, the State reported on the implementation of this act, which was attended by high-ranking officials and the next-of-kin of the victim, and it was translated into Quechua. This information was disseminated on the website of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights and other publications, and therefore requested that this measure be deemed fulfilled. 37. By way of a brief dated August 8, 2013, the representatives mentioned that "the act of acknowledgment of responsibility held on July 23, 2013,” at the Ministry of Justice, with the presence of the President of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the President of the Council of Ministers, the Minister of Justice, representatives of the Public Prosecutor’s Office and the next-of-kin of the victim. 38. The Court values that the public act of acknowledgment of responsibility for the disappearance of Mr. Anzualdo Castro was carried out last July 23, 2013, in which the victim's next-of-kin and high-ranking government officials participated. In light of the information provided by the parties, the Court considers that the State has fully complied with this measure of reparation. H. The State must erect a plaque in the Museum of Memory, in the presence of the next-of-kin, if they so wish, in a public act, within the term of two years, as of notice of this Judgment (operative paragraph twelve) 39. During the hearing on monitoring of compliance, the State informed that “the plaque of the Museum of Memory had not been carried out because [there is] not yet a Museum of Memory.” Similarly, by way of a brief of July 5, 2013, it stated that the construction of the Museum of Memory was in progress. 40. By way of a brief of August 8, 2013, the representatives stated that “the State did not provide information that would objectively allow progress to be monitored in the construction and placement of a plaque in the museum of memory nor when this measure is expected to be accomplished.” Moreover, they reported about several requests that have been made to domestic authorities in attempts at setting the plaque. 26 41. In this regard, the Court appreciates the actions taken by the State to carry out the construction of the Museum of Memory, and urges that the State, once the site is established, proceed without delay with the public act of setting the plaque in memory of Mr. Anzualdo Castro. Specifically, the State is required to report on the scheduled date for the completion of the Museum and the respective placement of the plaque. I. The State must adopt the necessary measures to provide, immediately as of notice of this Judgment, the next-of-kin of Mr. Kenneth Ney Anzualdo 26 Cf. The request addressed to the President of the High Level Presidential Commission to organize a Place for Memory, Tolerance, and Social Inclusion, on April 24, 2013, which requested the placement of the plaque, in order to preserve the memory of Mr. Anzualdo Castro and as a guarantee of non-repetition, under the terms provided in Judgment of September 22, 2009, since the period of two years that had been granted to the State had expired. 11

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3