16. On this specific point, the Court emphasizes the importance of compliance with this measure, since it involves the moral satisfaction of victims and allows the next-of-kin to bring closure to the grieving process they have endured for years. 14 In view of the foregoing, since the State has not reported specific progress in this respect, the Court asks the State to report on the specific actions it has carried out in relation to the search and identification of Kenneth Ney Anzualdo Castro or, where appropriate, his remains, for which it must provide a work schedule on the implementation of the measures to that effect. C. Obligation to continue making all the necessary efforts and adopt the administrative and legal measures and public policies that may correspond, to determine and identify the people who disappeared during the internal conflict according to the most effective technical and scientific means and, as long as it is possible and scientifically advisable (operative paragraph seven) 17. By way of a brief dated May 29, 2013, the State indicated that on November 1, 2012, the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights authorized the transfer of one million, one hundred thousand nuevos soles (amount that adds up to the approximate sum of three hundred (f. 3 TA) thousand dollars of the United States of America) in favor of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, “for the purchase of chemical reagents and supplies required for the identification of 1,500 human remains of victims of the violence that took place in the period between May 1980 to November 2000.” In addition, during the private hearing on monitoring of compliance, the State indicated that "[a]s a result of the joint work between [different] Criminal Prosecutor’s Offices [ ... ] and the Specialized Rulings Team, major advances were made in the recovery, identification, and delivery of bodies of the victims of forced disappearances and extrajudicial executions, [and] as [ ... ] [the State] reported to the United Nation’s Human Rights Council, in the period between April 2002 to April 2012 , a total of 2109 individual remains were [recovered, ] of which 1074 [were] identified and returned to their families.” 18. By way of a brief dated August 8, 2013, the representatives stated that "[i]n particular, the Court [had] order[ed] the standardization of investigation criteria and the creation of a genetic data system that would allow for the determination and elucidation of blood relationship of the victims, as well as their identification,” but nevertheless the State did not present any information in this regard. 19. In its judgment, the Court highlighted the opinion of expert Baraybar, who determined that the State did not have a public policy that would allow determinations to be made regarding those disappearances that occurred between 1980 and 2000, and he considered that there were serious methodological shortcomings, among which he highlighted the absence of efforts to define the scope of people who they were searching for. In addition, the Court found that there was no agreement regarding the number of disappearances that took place during the internal conflict in Peru. 15 The Court considered it appropriate for the State to establish, among other measures to adopt, a system of genetic information that allows for the determination and elucidation of the blood relationship of the 14 Cf. Case of the Dos Erres Massacre V. Guatemala. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 24, 2009. Series C No. 211, para. 245, and Case of Gómez Palomino. Order of Monitoring of Compliance of February 13, 2013, supra, Considering clause thirteen. 15 Case of Anzualdo Castro, supra, para. 188. 6