AND ESTABLISHES By five votes to one, that: 1. This Judgment constitutes per se a form of reparation. 2. The State must adopt, as soon as possible, appropriate measures to annul the prohibition to practice IVF, so that those persons who wish to use this assisted reproduction technique can do so without any impediment to the exercise of the rights that were declared violated in this Judgment. The State must provide information on the measures adopted in this regard, in accordance with paragraph 336 of this Judgment. 3. The State must regulate, as soon as possible, the aspects that it considers necessary for the implementation of IVF, taking into account the principles established in this Judgment, and must establish systems of inspection and quality control of the institutions and professional qualified that perform this type of assisted reproduction technique. The State must provide information every year on the gradual implementation of these systems, in accordance with paragraph337 of this Judgment. 4. The State must include the availability of IVF within the infertility treatments and programs offered by its health care services, in keeping with the obligation of guarantee in relation to the principle of non-discrimination. The State must provide information every six months on the measures adopted to make these services available gradually to those who require them and on the plans made to this end, in accordance with paragraph 338 of this Judgment. 5. The State must provide the victims with psychological treatment, free of charge and immediately, for up to four years, through the State’s specialized health care institutions, as established in paragraph 326 of this Judgment. 6. The State must make the publications indicated in paragraph 329 of this Judgment, within six months of its notification. 7. The State must implement permanent education and training programs and courses on human rights, reproductive rights and non-discrimination for judicial officials in all areas and at all echelons of the Judiciary, as established in paragraph 341 of this Judgment. 8. The State must pay the amounts established in paragraphs 355 and 363 of this Judgment, as compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, and for reimbursement of costs and expenses, in the terms of paragraph 373 of this Judgment. 9. The State must submit to the Court a general report on the measures adopted to comply with this Judgment within one year of its notification. 10. The Court will monitor full compliance with this Judgment, in exercise of its authority and in compliance with its obligations under the American Convention on Human Rights, and will consider this case concluded when the State has complied fully with the measures ordered herein. Judge Diego García-Sayán informed the Court of his Concurrent Opinion, and Judge Eduardo Vio Gross informed the Court of his Dissenting Opinion, and they accompany this Judgment.