CEJIL

- Libreria
- Registrarse

Done, at San Jose, Costa Rica, on November 28, 2012, in the Spanish and English languages, the Spanish text being authentic. Diego García-Sayán President Leonardo A. Franco Margarette May Macaulay Rhadys Abreu Blondet Alberto Pérez Pérez Eduardo Vio Grossi Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary So ordered, Diego García-Sayán President Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

● ● ●

Uwazi es desarrollado por
CEJIL
Libreria
Acceder

Información
17relaciones

Consejos de búsqueda

Buscar texto

Type something in the search box to get some results.

Tabla de Contenidos

I INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE AND PURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE 2
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT 2
III PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS9
A) Failure to exhaust domestic remedies 9
B) Time-barred petition filed by Karen Espinoza and Héctor Jiménez Acuña12
C) Lack of competence of the Court to hear “new facts not included” in the“facts of the application” 14
IV JURISDICTION 15
V EVIDENCE 15
A) Documentary, testimonial and expert evidence15
B) Admission of the evidence 16
B.1) Admission of documentary evidence 16
B.2) Admission of the statements of the presumed victims, and of the testimonial and expert evidence18
VI FACTS 2
A) Assisted reproduction and in vitro fertilization techniques20
B) The Executive Decree22
C) Judgment of the Constitutional Chamber of March 15, 2000 23
D) Remedies filed by Ileana Henchoz and Karen Espinoza26
E) Draft legislation27
F) Specific situation of the presumed victims2
F.1) Grettel Artavia Murillo and Miguel Mejías Carballo28
F.2) Ile ana Henchoz and Miguel Yamuni29
F.3) Oriéster Rojas and Julieta González31
F.4) Víktor Sanabria León and Claudia Carro Maklouf 32
F.5) Giovanni Vega and Joaquinita Arroyo33
F.6) Karen Espinoza and Héctor Jiménez34
F.7) Carlos Eduardo de Jesús Vargas Solórzano and María del Socorro Calderón Porras35
F.8) Enrique Acuña Cartín and Ana Cristina Castillo León 36
F.9) Andrea Bianchi Bruna y Germán Moreno Valencia2
VII PRIOR CONSIDERATION ON THE PURPOSE OF THE INSTANT CASE 37
VIII RIGHT TO PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE AND RIGHT TO PERSONAL INTEGRITY IN RELATION TO PERSONAL AUTONOMY, SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, THE RIGHT TO ENJOY THE BENEFITS OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS AND THE PRINCIPLE OF NON-DISCRIMINATION2
A) Scope of the rights to personal integrity, personal liberty, and private and family life Arguments of the Commission and allegations of the parties in this case41
B) Effects of the absolute prohibition of IVF46
C) Interpretation of Article 4(1) of the Convention as relevant in this case49
C.1) Interpretation in accordance with the ordinary meaning of the terms53
C.2) Systematic and historical interpretation58
C.2.a) Inter-American human rights system58
i) Preparatory work of the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man59
ii) Preparatory work of the American Convention on Human Rights60
iii) Systematic interpretation of the American Convention and the American Declaration65
C.2.b) Universal human right system65
i) Universal Declaration of Human Rights65
ii) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 65
iii) Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women67
iv) Convention on the Rights of the Child67
C.2.c) European human rights system68
C.2.d) African human rights system70
C.2.e) Conclusion concerning systematic interpretation71
C.3) Evolutive interpretation 71
C.3.a) The legal status of the embryo 72
C.3.b) IVF regulations and practice in comparative law74
C.4) The principle of the most favorable interpretation, and the object and purpose of the treaty76
C.5) Conclusion on the interpretation of Article 4(1)3
D) Proportionality of the prohibition78
D.1) Severity of the limitation of the rights involved in this case81
D.2) Severity of the interference as a result of indirect discrimination owing to the disproportionate impact in relation to disability, gender and financial situation83
D.2.a) Indirect discrimination in relation to the condition of disability 85
D.2.b) Indirect discrimination in relation to gender87
D.2.c) Indirect discrimination in relation to financial situation 89
D.3) Dispute regarding the alleged embryonic loss90
D.4) Conclusion regarding the assessment of the severity of the interference in relation to the impact on the intended purpose93
E) Final conclusion of the merits of the case93
VIII REPARATIONS93
A) Injured party94
B) Measures of rehabilitation and satisfaction and guarantees of non-repetition95
B.1) Measures of psychological rehabilitation95
B.2) Measures of satisfaction: publication of the Judgment 96
B.3) Guarantees of non-repetition96
B.3.1) State measures that do not prevent the practice of IVF96
B.3.2) Campaign on the rights of persons with reproductive disabilities98
B.3.3) Other measures requested98
C) Compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage99
C.1) Pecuniary damage99
C.2) Non-pecuniary damage 3
D) Costs and expenses 103
E) Method of complying with the payments ordered105
IX OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS106

Artavia Murillo y otros. Sentencia de 28 de noviembre de 2012

Sentencia de la Corte IDH

Preview

Tipo

Costas
Excepciones Preliminares
Fondo
Reparaciones

Fecha: 28 nov 2012

Mecanismo

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Número: C-257

País

Costa Rica

Firmantes

Alberto Pérez Pérez
Diego García-Sayán
Eduardo Vio Grossi
Leonardo A. Franco
Margarette May Macaulay
Rhadys Abreu Blondet

Votos separados

Diego García-Sayán
Eduardo Vio Grossi

Documentos primarios

Artavia Murillo y otros. Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 28 noviembre de 2012.pdf
Spanish
Descargar Ver
Artavia Murillo et al. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of November 28, 2012.pdf
English
Descargar Ver
Artavia Murillo e outros. Exceções Preliminares, Mérito, Reparações e Custas. Sentença de 28 de novembro de 2012.pdf
Portuguese
Descargar Ver

Archivos de soporte

Artavia Murillo e outros. Exceções Preliminares, Mérito, Reparações e Custas. Sentença de 28 de novembro de 2012.doc1.27 MB

Artavia Murillo et al. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of November 28, 2012.doc939.01 kB

Artavia Murillo y otros. Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 28 noviembre de 2012.doc863.74 kB

Sin referencias

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

Firmantes5
- Juez/a y/o Comisionado/a5
Mecanismo1
- Organismo1
País1
- País1
Firmante Voto separado1
- Juez/a y/o Comisionado/a1
Votos separados2
- Voto Separado2
No existe etiqueta1
- Causa1
Documentos de la CorteIDH6
- Resolución de Presidencia de la CorteIDH1
- Resolución de la Corte IDH2
- Audiencia3

Crear Referencia

Seleccionar tipo de relación

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Consejos de búsqueda

Notificaciones

Estás al día

La actividad nueva se mostrará aquí.