3 radio station with coverage in Barranca Bejuco, and the publication of the Judgment and the official summary in Me'paa on a website belonging to the federal state and on a website belonging to the state of Guerrero, the representatives indicated that Mrs. Rosendo Cantú gives express consent for the implementation of these measures, provided that in such publications, and the radio broadcast, the following parts be excluded: i) the provision of scholarships for her and her children; ii) the provision of treatment for female victims at the Caxitepec health centre; and, iii) payment of the amounts awarded as pecuniary and nonpecuniary damages, and costs and expenses. 5. Representatives substantiated this condition on the potential increase in risk and uncertainty that could affect Mrs. Rosendo Cantú, as well as her family members and community. Such an increase would occur if "notice were given of the granting of a direct, monetary or any other kind of benefit to the victims or [their] community [...]." They stated that "the collective or communal dimension of certain reparation measures makes it necessary to collectively communicate, evaluate, and discuss such measures within the communities. This process is being carried out [...] and it could be affected by the publication of certain aspects of [the Judgment] and certain reparation measures." Finally, they emphasized that if the Court were to consider that the request cannot be carried out as requested by Mrs. Rosendo Cantú, "the Court should consider that [she] does not [give] her consent for these publications." 6. In this regard, the Court notes that the consent given by Mrs. Rosendo Cantú to implement the measures provided for in paragraph 229 of the Judgment was dependant upon its partial publication, i.e., eliminating information that is unrelated to the aim of the Tribunal's question and not in accordance with the Judgment of the present case. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Court notes the lack of consent given by Mrs. Rosendo Cantú for the aforementioned publications and, therefore, rules that this process to monitor compliance with the Judgment is considered closed with respect to these reparation measures. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercising its authority to monitor compliance with its decisions in accordance with Articles 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, Article 30 of the Statue, and Article 31(1) of its Rules of Procedure, DECIDES: 1. In accordance with the provisions of Considering Clauses 2 and 3 of this Order, Mrs. Rosendo Cantú expressly gave consent to the State to carry out the following measures set forth in the Judgment: a) Public disclosure of the results of investigations and prosecutions conducted by the State as part of the present case; and,