ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF MAY 28, 2010 CASE OF YATAMA V. NICARAGUA MONITORING OF COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT HAVING SEEN: 1. The Judgment on preliminary exceptions, merits, reparations, and costs (hereinafter “the Judgment”) issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, (hereinafter “the Court,” “the Inter-American Court” or “the Tribunal”) on June 23, 2005. 2. The Order of the Court of November 29, 2006. 3. The Order of the Tribunal of August 4, 2008, in which it declared, inter alia: 1. That […] it w[ould continue] proceeding[s] for monitoring compliance with the following obligations pending fulfillment in the instant case, namely: a) the adoption, within a reasonable time, of such legislative measures as may be necessary to provide for a simple, prompt, and effective judicial remedy to review the decisions adopted by the Supreme Electoral Council which may affect human rights, such as the right to participate in government, in compliance with the relevant legal and treaty guarantees, and to repeal any provisions preventing said remedy from being sought (ninth operative paragraph of Judgment of June 23, 2005); b) the amendment to Electoral Act No. 331 of 2000 so that it clearly regulates the consequences of non-compliance with electoral participation requirements, the procedures to be followed by the Supreme Electoral Council in finding such noncompliance, and the reasoned decisions to be adopted by said Council in that regard, as well as the rights of those whose participation is affected by a decision of the State (tenth operative paragraph of the Judgment of June 23, 2005); c) the reform of the regulation of those requirements established in Electoral Act No. 331 of 2000 that were found to be in violation of the American Convention and the adoption of such measures as may be required for the members of indigenous and ethnic communities to be able to effectively take part in election processes in accordance with their values, customs, and traditions (eleventh operative paragraph of Judgment of June 23, 2005); d) the payment of the compensation set for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, which amount is to be paid to the YATAMA organization, which shall distribute it as appropriate (twelfth operative paragraph of Judgment of June 23, 2005); e) the payment of the amount due on account of costs and expenses incurred as a result of the proceedings started before the domestic courts and the Inter-American system for the protection of human rights to the YATAMA organization, which shall subsequently deliver to CENIDH and CEJIL such portion thereof as may be required to reimburse them for the expenses they incurred (thirteenth operative paragraph of Judgment of June 23, 2005); and