75 229. As it has ordered on other occasions,280 the Court considers that, as a measure of satisfaction, the State must publish once, in Spanish, in the Official Gazette, paragraphs 1 to 5, 11, 13, 16 to 18, 24, 25, 70 to 79, 107 to 121, 127 to 131, 137 to 139, 159 to 167, 174 to 182, 184, 185, 200 to 202, 206 and 207 of this Judgment, including the titles of each chapter and of the respective section, -without the corresponding footnotes-, and including the operative paragraphs hereto. Moreover, if Mrs. Rosendo Cantú authorizes it, the State must: i) publish the official summary issued by the Court in a newspaper with widespread national circulation, in Spanish, and in a newspaper with widespread circulation in the state of Guerrero, in Spanish and Me´paa;281 ii) publish this Judgment in its entirety,282 together with the translation into Me’paa of the official summary, which should be made on an appropriate web site of the federal State and of the state of Guerrero, taking into account the characteristics of the publication ordered to be carried out, and this must remain available for at least one year, and iii) broadcast the official summary once, in both languages, on a radio station283 with coverage in Barranca Bejuco. The State has six months from the notification of this Judgment to make the publications and broadcasts indicated above. v) Policy that guarantees access to justice of indigenous women and that respects their cultural identity 230. The Commission asked the Court to order the State to guarantee access to justice to indigenous women by way of the design of a policy respects their cultural identity. 231. The State presented a large amount of information on the various actions and measures it has adopted to eradicate discriminatory practices, particularly against women and indigenous persons. The State made reference to, among other programs, the Intercultural Model for the Development of the Indigenous Peoples, facilitated by the Secretariat of Indigenous Affairs of the state of Guerrero. This program includes as one of its central points the legal reform and the indigenous recognition, and its services are aimed at reviewing and systematizing laws to formulate a reform proposal and bill on rights and culture in the state of Guerrero. Moreover, the Intercultural Model includes a Defense and Legal Aid Program for Indigenous Peoples, whose actions are aimed at offering defense services, legal aid, and administrative procedures in favor of the indigenous population. Likewise, Mexico also reported on the Program for the promotion of collaboration on justice in which projects have been carried out with civil organizations and the United Nations Fund for Women in order to promote the leadership of indigenous women in public matters. Lastly, during the public hearing, the State presented documentation relating to actions and programs in the area of gender and of indigenous peoples, including the Institutional and Social Enhancement Program for the Exercise of the Human Rights of Indigenous Women, prepared by the Government of the state of Guerrero, which proposes an “Intercultural and gender equity model for the exercise of the human rights of indigenous women.” 232. The Court notes that the State provided certain information on programs and actions implemented in this sphere, whose existence or validity was not contested by the Commission, and to which the Commission did not provide any information indicating possible shortcomings. In this respect, the Court has already established that the obligation to motivate and establish a foundation for the Commission’s claims for reparations and costs is not fulfilled by general requests without any legal or factual 280 Cf. Barrios Altos v. Peru. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 30, 2001. Series C No. 87, Operative paragraph 5(d); Case of Chitay Nech et al. v. Guatemala. supra note 25, para. 244, and Case of Manuel Cepeda Vargas, supra note 21, para. 220. 281 Cf. Case of Chitay Nech et al., supra note 25, para. 244 and 245. 282 Cf. Serrano Cruz Sisters v. El Salvador. Merits, Reparations, and Costs. Judgment of March 1, 2005. Series C No. 120, para. 195; Case of Chitay Nech et al., supra note 25, para. 244, and Case of Manuel Cepeda Vargas, supra note 25, para. 220. 283 Cf. Yakye Axa Indigenous Community supra note 254, para. 227; Case of Tiu Tojín, supra note 254, para. 108, and Case of Chitay Nech et al., supra note 25, para. 245.