nearest to their places of residence415 in Chile for as long as necessary. When providing this treatment, the particular circumstances and needs of each victim must also be considered, as well as their customs and traditions, as agreed with each of them and following an individual assessment.416 To this end, the victims must advise the State if they wish to receive this medical, psychological or psychiatric treatment within six months of notification of this Judgment. 3. Measures of satisfaction a) Publication and broadcasting of the Judgment 427. CEJIL asked that the Court order Chile: (i) “to publish the pertinent parts of the judgment once in the official gazette […] and the summary of the judgment prepared by the Court in another national newspaper with widespread circulation” within “six months of the date of notification of the Judgment”; (ii) “to publish immediately the complete text [of the Judgment] on the official websites of the Presidency of the Republic, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Social Development, and the National Indigenous Development Corporation (CONADI), until it has been complied with fully,” and (iii) “to broadcast, within six months of notification of the judgment, the official summary on a radio station with broad coverage in Region IX” and, to this end, “the State must translate the [official summary] into the Mapudungun language” so that “the Mapuche people may be made aware of it.” The FIDH requested the “publication of part of the judgment in the media,” and also the “broadcasting of an official summary of the judgment by radio, in Spanish and in Mapudungun, taking special care to ensure that it is broadcast in areas with a high concentration of Mapuche people.” It also requested that the judgment be aired “simultaneously on all television stations at the time of the main news program.” 428. The Court establishes, as it has in other cases,417 that the State must publish, within six months of notification of this Judgment: (a) the official summary of this Judgment prepared by the Court, once, in the official gazette; (b) the official summary of this Judgment prepared by the Court, once, in a national newspaper with widespread circulation, and (c) this Judgment in its entirety, available for one year, on an official website of the State, taking into consideration the characteristics of the publication ordered. 429. The Court also finds it appropriate as it has in other cases,418 to establish that the State must broadcast the official summary of the Judgment, in Spanish and in Mapudungun, using a radio station with broad coverage in Regions VIII and IX. The broadcast must be made on the first Sunday of the month on at least three occasions. The State must advise the common interveners, at least two weeks in advance, of the date, time and station of this broadcast. The State must comply with this measure within six months of notification of the Judgment. 430. The two common interveners of the representatives asked that the Court order the State to make a “public acknowledgement of responsibility” and a public apology to the victims. The Court considers that the delivery of this Judgment, the measure to annul all the effects of the criminal judgments (supra para. 422), as well as the measures for the publication and publicity 415 Cf. Case of the Las Dos Erres Massacre v. Guatemala, para. 270, and Case of Osorio Rivera and family members v. Peru, para. 256. 416 Cf. Case of the 19 Tradesmen v. Colombia. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of July 5, 2004. Series C No. 109, para. 278, and Case of Osorio Rivera and family members v. Peru, para. 256. 417 Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Reparations and costs, para. 79, and Case of Liakat Ali Alibux v. Suriname, para. 147. 418 Cf. Case of the Yakye Axa Indigenous Community v. Paraguay, para. 227, and Case of Pueblo Indígena Kichwa de Sarayaku v. Ecuador, para. 308. 140