d) Disregard of judicial decisions […]. 56 53. Of the total of original petitioners who were dismissed, 28 were subsequently reinstated either because the appeals filed against their dismissal were successful or because they were rehired. Thus, the Inter-American Commission considered that the universe of alleged victims was limited to the 65 petitioners who were not rehired. It also noted that none of the six members of the STOJ’s Executive Committee was rehired. 57 According to the Commission, of the 65 petitioners who were not reinstated, 49 filed some type of remedy against their dismissal. 58 However, the case file only contains evidence of the appeals filed by 14 persons. 59 VII MERITS 54. The instant case concerns the dismissal of a group of workers of the Judiciary 60 following the declaration of illegality of a strike organized after the failure of a process to renegotiate 56 Letter from MINUGUA to Víctor Hugo Godoy, president of COPRODEH, of March 15, 2000 (evidence file, folios 624 to 627). 57 According to information provided by the Commission, six of the alleged victims formed part of the Executive Committee; however, in the information sheets on the alleged victims provided by the Commission there is only specific information on their role of the following persons on the STOJ’s Executive Committee: Igmain Galicia Pimentel (evidence file, folio 188), Orlan Manuel Morales Pineda (evidence file, folio 248) and Adolfo Nery Rojas Martínez (evidence file, folio 321). In the case of Lorenzo David Cupul Luna, his personal file states that he is a member of the Labor and Dispute Secretariat of the Petén Branch, but it does not state whether this body forms part of the Executive Committee (evidence file, folio 172). Similarly, the file of Juan Girón Cáceres indicates that he was "Secretary of Interdepartmental Affairs" (evidence file, folio 194); the file of Oscar Moisés Leonardo indicates that he was "Vocal Secretary of the Branch of the Department of Baja Verapaz" (evidence file, folio 224); the file of Edgar Arturo López Arias, states that he was "Recording Secretary of the Baja Verapaz branch" (evidence file, folio 228); the file of Edgar Arnaldo Luarca Domínguez indicates that he was "General Secretary" (evidence file, folio 241); the file of Ramón Arístides Salazar Gálvez states that he was "Secretary of Disputes "(evidence file, folio 327). In addition, in the public hearing, the declarant Freddy Eduardo Ávila Rodríguez affirmed that at the time of the facts he was Secretary of Minutes and Agreements of the union branch in the Department of Chimaltenango. They are: 1) AJQUEJAY XEC Rafael; 2) ARIAS Carlos Enrique; 3) ARRIOLA CONDE Luis René; 4) BENITEZ Luis Eduardo; 5) BONILLA LÓPEZ Virgilio Marcos; 6) CANEL PÉREZ Alejandro; 7) CARIAS GÓMEZ Milton Rogers; 8) CASTAÑEDA VAIDES Oscar Leonel; 9) CASTILLO VERON Alfredo; 10) COCHOJIL MARTÍNEZ Héctor Aníbal; 11) CUPUL LUNA Lorenzo David; 12) CUYAN GONZALEZ Fidel; 13) CHEVES LUNA Gustavo Adolfo; 14) ESCALANTE Carlos Enrique; 15) GALICIA PIMENTEL Igmain; 16) GIRON Arnulfo; 17) GIRÓN CACEROS Juan; 18) GIRÓN GALINDO Gabriel de Jesús; 19) GONZÁLEZ Miguel; 20) GUERRA VALIENTE Carlos Enrique; 21) GUTIÉRREZ GARCÍA Roberto; 22) LEONARDO Carlos Antonio; 23) LEONARDO Oscar Moisés; 24) LETONA de GONZÁLEZ Alba Ninet; 25) LÓPEZ ARIAS Edgar Arturo; 26) LÓPEZ GARCÍA Gerardo; 27) LÓPEZ GIRÓN Marcos Humberto; 28) LÓPEZ LÓPEZ René Alberto; 29) MORALES MATÍAS Edgar Romeo (evidence file, folios 2104 and ff.); 30) MORALES PINEDA Orlan Manuel; 31) MORATAYA CASTELLANOS Ricardo; 32) MUÑOZ TALA Juan Francisco; 33) PADILLA IZEPPI Mynor Pablo; 34) PADILLA MENDEZ Oscar Basilo; 35) PALACIOS URIZAR Mario René; 36) PAXTOR Miguel Ángel; 37) PORTILLO Dora Carolina; 38) QUEVEDO QUEZADA de MARROQUIN Evelin Marleny; 39) REYNOSO MAS Minor Rolando; 40) RÍOS de LEÓN Armando Moisés; 41) ROJAS MARTÍNEZ Adolfo Nely; 42) RUANO SIAN Miguel Augusto; 43) SALAZAR GALVES Ramón Arístides; 44) SAMAYOA CARIAS Vicente; 45) SOLOGAISTOA MORAN Fernando Antonio; 46) SOTO GODOY Sergio Eduardo; 47) TECUN GARCÍA Edwin Remigio; 48) VELASQUEZ David Rubén; 49) VELASQUEZ Ramiro Fernando. 58 They are: 1) CANEL PÉREZ Alejandro (appeal dismissed on (illegible date), evidence file, folio 2433); 2) CUPUL LUNA Lorenzo David (evidence file, folios 1980 and ff.; appeal dismissed on October 28, 1999, evidence file folio 2428); 3) GONZÁLEZ Miguel (appeal dismissed on September 14, 1999, evidence file folio 2430); 4) LEONARDO Carlos Antonio (evidence file, folios 975 and 976); 5) LEONARDO Oscar Moisés (evidence file, folios 2291 to 2293); 6) LETONA de GONZÁLEZ Alba Ninet (appeal granted in a ruling by the Fifth Labor and Social Welfare Court of the First Economic Zone of April 27, 2000, evidence file, folios 961 to 972); 7) LÓPEZ ARIAS Edgar Arturo (evidence file, folios 2075 and ff.); 8) LÓPEZ LÓPEZ René Alberto (appeal dismissed on September 14, 1999, evidence file folio 2432); 9) MORALES MATÍAS Edgar Romeo (evidence file, folios 2104 to 2107); 10) MUÑOZ TALA Juan Francisco (evidence file, folios 2132 1 2133; appeal dismissed on October 25, 1999, evidence file, folio 2945); 11) PORTILLO Dora Carolina (evidence file, folios 2164 to 2168); 12) QUEVEDO QUEZADA de MARROQUIN Evelin Marleny (evidence file, folio 2178); 13) REYNOSO MAS Minor Rolando (evidence file, folios 2196 to 2208) and 14) SOTO GODOY Sergio Eduardo (evidence file, folio 2411). 59 60 According to the representative, the alleged victims held the following positions within the Judiciary: 18