ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF JUNE 30, 2011 CASE OF YATAMA v. NICARAGUA MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT HAVING SEEN: 1. The Judgment on Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs (hereinafter "the Judgment") passed by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter "the Court," "the Inter-American Court" or "the Tribunal") on June 23, 2005. 2. The Orders of the Court of November 29, 2006; August 4, 2008; and, May 28, 2010. In the latter, inter alia, the Tribunal declared: 1. [...] The State has partially complied with the following operative paragraphs of the Judgment: a) To pay compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages to the YATAMA organization. YATAMA must then distribute the compensation as appropriate (Operative Paragraph 12 of the Judgment[...] ); b) To pay the amounts awarded as costs and expenses incurred domestically and in international proceedings before the inter-American Human Rights Protection System to YATAMA, which will in turn pay the appropriate compensation to CENIDH and CEJIL for the expenses they covered (Operative Paragraph 13 of the Judgment[...] ). 2. The Court shall keep the monitoring process open for the outstanding points indicated in the previous declarative point, as well as the monitoring process for the following: a) To adopt, within a reasonable period, the legislative measures necessary to establish a simple, quick and effective judicial recourse that allows the decisions of the Supreme Electoral Board regarding human rights, such as political rights, to be controlled in observance of the respective legal and conventional guarantees, and to repeal those laws that impede the implementation of this recourse (Operative Paragraph 9 of the Judgment[...]); b) To reform the Electoral Law No. 331 of 2000 so that it clearly regulates the consequences of not fulfilling the requisites of electoral participation, the procedures that must be observed by the Supreme Electoral Board to determine such non-compliance, and the decisions that must be taken by the Board in this regard, as well as the rights of those persons whose participation is affected by a State ruling (Operative Paragraph 10 of the Judgment[...]); c) To reform the regulation of the requirements provided for in Electoral Law No. 331 of 2000 that were declared to be in violation of the American Convention and to adopt the necessary measures so that members of the indigenous and ethnic communities can participate in electoral processes in an effective manner, taking into account their traditions, uses, and customs (Operative Paragraph 11 of the Judgment[...]); d) To publicize via a radio station with widespread coverage on the Atlantic Coast the paragraphs indicated in Chapter VII (Proven Facts), Chapters IX and X, and the Operative Paragraphs of the Judgment (Operative Paragraph 8 of the Judgment[...]). [And ruled:]