32 Provincial Prosecutor's Office of Huancavelica that the 14 villagers abducted by members of the Army had been “found dead in the locality of Chunomayo, jurisdiction of Huachocolpa,” and that they had been “identified by their relatives, Ponciano Hilario, Viviano Hilario and others.” They also requested that the 14 bodies be removed. 87 99. In response to these complaints (supra paras. 95 to 98), which also reported that the bodies were found in an abandoned mine in a place called “Rodeo-Pampa” in the “Chunomayo” sector, personnel from the Mixed Provincial Prosecutor's Office of Huancavelica went to Lircay on July 14, 1991, and the following day visited the Chunomayo Mine, guided by Viviano Hilario Mancha, without finding anything, “since they apparently got lost arriving at [the] wrong place.” 88 100. On July 17, 1991, Nicolás Hilario Morán, president of the administrative council of the Santa Bárbara peasant community, and Máximo Pérez Torres, treasurer of its municipal agency, filed two complaints. The first was filed before the Special Prosecutor of the Ombudsman’s Office, 89 and the second before the Minister of Defense, 90 for the homicide of 14 community members on July 4, 1991, including seven children and two elderly people, who had been detained in a military operation carried out in the community of Santa Bárbara by military personnel from the Huancavelica and Lircay military bases. That same day, Nicolás Hilario Morán, together with Lorenzo Quispe Huamán, prosecutor of the community of Santa Bárbara, reiterated their request to the Provincial Prosecutor’s Office of Huancavelica to set a date for the removal of the bodies from the “Misteriosa” or “Vallarón” mine. 91 101. On July 18, 1991, the assigned prosecutor together with the examining magistrate, police officers and villagers from Santa Bárbara, including Zósimo Hilario Quispe and Viviano Hilario Mancha, traveled to the “Misteriosa” or “Vallarón” mine, where they found only fragments of human remains at the mine entrance: a “large” braid of human hair with scalp particles, a “medium-sized” lock of human hair, a strand of human hair, a strand of human hair attached to a segment of scalp, a segment of a foot (terminal region), a vulvar segment with part of the anus and part of the perineum region and human external and internal female genitalia, a human skull bone particle, a “large segment” of a human tongue, a human bone segment, two human bone articular surfaces, a human distal forearm and hand segment, a lung parenchyma segment, three bone tissue segments and soft tissue segments, and a portion of hair attached to human scalp segment, among others. In addition, 35 dynamite cartridges, 6 pieces of fuse and other remains were found in that location; these items were sent on July 22, 1991, to the Departmental Headquarters of the Technical Police of Cercado, for investigative purposes and to clarify the facts. The examining magistrate sent the rest of the remains found to the forensic medical examiner to determine whether these fragments were human remains. 92 In this regard, a record exists of the “Preliminary Anatomical-Pathological Identification” of July 19, 1991, issued by the Directorate of Forensic Medicine and Morgues of Huancavelica, which describes the identification 3900), and record of the statement made by Viviano Hilario Mancha before the Office of the Special Attorney of the Ombudsman of July 23, 1991, (evidence file, folio 53). 87 Cf. Official letter No. 020-CCSB-91 of July 12, 1991 (evidence file, folio 50). 88 Cf. Official letter No. 0462-91-MP-FPM-HVCA of July 23, 1991, sent by the Huancavelica Mixed Provincial Prosecutor’s Office to the Senior Public Prosecutor of Huancavelica (evidence file, folios 3887 and 3888), and brief of the State of September 23, 1991 (evidence file, folio 67). See also, Parte No. 158-SE-JLP of August 26, 1991, which includes an account of the procedure carried out on July 15, 1991 (evidence file, folio 3904). 89 Cf. Complaint of Nicolás Hilario Morán and Máximo Pérez Torres filed on July 17, 1991 before the Office of the Special Attorney of the Ombudsman (evidence file, folios 22 to 25). 90 Cf. Complaint of Nicolás Hilario Morán and Máximo Pérez Torres of July 17, 1991 before the Ministry of Defense of Peru (evidence file, folios 91 to 93). 91 Cf. Brief submitted on July 17, 1991, before the Huancavelica Provincial Prosecutor’s Office (evidence file, folio 193). 92 Cf. Official letter No. 0462-91-MP-FPM-HVCA of July 23, 1991, sent by the Huancavelica Mixed Provincial Prosecutor’s Office to the Senior Public Prosecutor of Huancavelica (evidence file, folios 3887 and 3888), and brief of the State of September 23, 1991 (evidence file, folio 67).

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3