determine […] who committed the attack with the firearm." In previous briefs, the State did not report on any measures implemented to the benefit of Mr. Caba. 30. With regard to Mr. Mansilla, the representatives contested "the documentation presented by the Argentine State […] without any impartial judicial oversight" and argued that the State “left Walter to his fate [,] guaranteeing his silence." With regard to Mr. Juan Pablo Caba, the representatives reported that the beneficiary checked into the Comodoro Rivadavia Regional Hospital on March 7, 2011. There, he expressed that "he was ambushed […]." According to the representatives, Mr. Caba was interrogated in the hospital and died on March 22, 2011, after several operations. On the day of his death, “Valeria [Torres] saw [four] uniformed police officers" who said they had been sent by a judge. Ms. Millacura Llaipén demanded that the doctor on call give "the reasons for deciding to disconnect [Mr. Caba] from the respirator […] without first communicating with his relatives." 31. The Commission stated that "the submission of information on [Mr. Mansilla] and the investigation pursued by the State to verify the cause of his death [was] of the highest importance."In addition, "it note[d] with concern the death of Juan Pablo Caba [...] under circumstances that have not yet been cleared up and […] without protection at the moment the incidents took place. […] The Commission awaits information from the State on the investigations opened into not only [the death of Mr. Caba] but also [with regard to] the allegations of the representatives regarding medical malpractice." 32. The Tribunal is saddened by the deaths of Mr. Mansilla and Mr. Caba. Although the information provided by the parties does not allow for the Court to determine whether the deaths of the beneficiaries were connected to the facts that led to the adoption of the instant provisional measures,21 the Tribunal highlights that at the time Mr. Caba was shot, the protective measures ordered previously by this Court to his benefit - which could have contributed to preventing this incident - were apparently not being effectively applied. 33. Without prejudice to this, in light of the deaths of Walter Mansilla and Juan Pablo Caba, the provisional measures ordered to their benefit are no longer in force. B) Obligation to coordinate evaluation of the mechanisms of protection with the beneficiaries and their representatives (operative paragraph of the Order of February 6, 2008). 34. The State reported multiple times that the measures implemented for the beneficiaries had been implemented in agreement with them. In contrast, the representatives stated in the brief of May 7, 2011, that there has been a "total absence of dialogue with the State […] since September 29, 2006." For its part, the Commission asked the Court to urge the State to allow the beneficiaries and their representatives to participate in the implementation of the provisional measures. 35. Regarding this, there is a discrepancy between the information submitted by the State and the representatives with regard to the implementation of this obligation. The Tribunal considers it pertinent to reiterate that in the Order of February 6, 2008, 21 Cf. Matter of Millacura Llaipén et al. Provisional Measures regarding Argentina, supra footnote 15, Considering 8. 11