16. The notes of the Secretary of June 4, July 9 and 23, 2013, wherein it communicated that the Inter-American Court rescheduled the private hearing on monitoring of compliance with the Judgment for August 19, 2013. 17. The Orders issued by the acting President on July 29 and August 7, 2013, in relation to the requests for assistance from the Victim’s Legal Assistance Fund of the Inter-American Court (hereinafter “the Assistance Fund”). 8 18. The private hearing on monitoring of compliance with the Judgment, held on August 19, 2013, at the Court’s headquarters. 9 19. The brief of August 28, 2013, wherein the common intervener Feria Tinta filed additional information to that which was provided during the private hearing. 20. The note of the Secretariat of August 30, 2013, wherein, pursuant to the instructions of the acting President, a request was made to the State for it to provide documentation, and to which during the arguments made in the private hearing regarding the monitoring of compliance it stated that it would provide (supra Having Seen clause 19), and to clarify which measures of reparations need a determination from the Specialized Court on Execution of Supranational Sentences prior to compliance. Moreover, regarding those reparations that are not pending or require a determination from said Court, a request was made that the State indicate what actions it is taking regarding compliance. 21. The brief of September 24, 2013, and its attachments, wherein the State provided information and documentation on the compliance with the Judgment regarding the requests made on August 30, (supra Having Seen clause 21). 22. The briefs of October 17, 18, and 23, 2013, wherein the common interveners Feria Tinta and Cassel filed, respectively, their observations to the information provided by the State on September 24, 2013. 23. The brief of November 9, 2013, wherein the Inter-American Commission filed its observations to the State’s reports and to the observations of the common intervening parties. 24. The note of the Secretariat of February 21, 2014, wherein, pursuant to the instructions of the President of the Court, 10 the State was given a period until March 14, 2014, to file the observations it deems relevant regarding the expenditures made when applying the Victim’s Legal Assistance Fund in the monitoring of compliance with this case (supra Having Seen clause 17). Peru did not file observations. 8 Available at: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/supervisiones/castro_07_08_13.pdf In accordance with Article 6(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the Court held a private hearing on monitoring of compliance with a panel of judges comprised of: Judge Manuel E. Ventura Robles, Acting President; Judge Robert F. Caldas; Judge Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto, and Judge Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot. At this hearing, the following appeared: a) for the Inter-American Commission: Silvia Serrano Guzmán, attorney for the Executive Secretariat; b) for the common interveners of the representatives of the victims: Monica Feria Tinta, victim and common intervener; Douglas Cassel, common intervener, Paula Cuellar and Amy Griffin, attorneys accredited by Douglas Cassel, c) for the State of Peru: Krupskaya Rosa Luz Ugarte Boluarte, attorney for the Specialized Supranational Public Prosecutor’s Office. 9 10 The President of the Court elected for the period of 2014-2015 is Judge Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto, of Colombian nationality. 4