2 2. That, as indicated in Considering Clauses numbers 10, 14 and 18 of the […] Order, the Court will keep the proceedings for monitoring compliance open in relation to the points with which compliance is still pending in the instant case, to wit: (a) to bring to a conclusion the pending investigations into the homicide of Ramón Mauricio Garcia Prieto and into the threats and acts of harassment suffered by Mr. José Mauricio Garcia Prieto Hirlemann and Mrs. Gloria Giralt de Garcia Prieto (operative paragraph number five in the Judgment delivered on November 20, 2007). (b) to publish once in a newspaper with wide national coverage the operative paragraphs in the Judgment, as well as paragraphs 1 to 3, and 5 to 11, in Section I; and 76 to 160, in Section VIII under the terms set forth in the Judgment (operative paragraph number six in the Judgment delivered on November 20, 2007); (c) to provide, free of charge, the medical, psychiatric, or psychological care that may be required by Mr. José Mauricio Garcia Prieto Hirlemann and by Mrs. Gloria Giralt de Garcia Prieto (operative paragraph number seven in the Judgment delivered on November 20, 2007). And Decide[d]: 1. To call upon the State to take all such steps as may be necessary to put into effect and promptly comply with those points with which compliance is still pending as ordered by the Court in the Judgment delivered on November 20, 2007, pursuant to the provisions in Article 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights. 2. To request the State to submit to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, no later than May 5, 2010, a report indicating all the measures adopted in order to comply with the reparations ordered by this Court with which compliance is still pending, as set forth in Considering Clauses numbers 10, 14 and 18, as well as in declarative paragraph number two, in the […] Order. 3. To request the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the representatives of the victims to submit their comments on the report by the State mentioned in the operative paragraph above, within four and six weeks, respectively, as of the date the report be received. 4. To continue monitoring the points with which compliance is still pending in the Judgment delivered on November 20, 2007. […] 3. The brief of May 27, 2010, through which the Republic of El Salvador (hereinafter “El Salvador” or “the State”) referred to compliance with the Judgment. 4. The briefs of April 29th and June 30, 2010, through which the victims’ representatives (hereinafter “the representatives”) forwarded their observations to that informed by the State with regard to compliance with the Judgment. 5. The communication of July 5, 2010, through which the Secretariat of the Court, following instructions of the President of the Court, requested that the representatives and the State forward the original or copy of the publication in a newspaper of ample circulation of the relevant parts of the Judgment, which according to the representatives was done on June 10, 2010. The communications of July 12 and 13, 2010, through which the State and the representatives filed a copy of the publication of the relevant parts of the Judgment ordered in the present case.