the Inter-American Court. Only in light of a clear expression of noncompliance – be it partial or total – from the State, combined with the failure of all possible means of supervision, has the Tribunal turned to the application of Article 65 of the American Convention, and has understood that in such an event, it no longer makes sense to continue requiring the State in question to present information pertaining to compliance with the pertinent judgment.8 In my view, this case has not yet reached this stage. Diego García-Sayán Judge Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary 8 Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of June 29, 2005.Monitoring Compliance with Judgment (Applicability of Article 65 of the American Convention on Human Rights). 4